-
Posts
1,047 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Events
Gallery
Store
Everything posted by Angels in 2030
-
The Official 2024 Draft Thread
Angels in 2030 replied to Dave Saltzer's topic in LA Angels | MLB Daily
Detmers was an excellent pick at the time...and looking good now as well. Maybe you've forgotten: Wilson, Ward, Thaiss. I think Adams was a huge reach at that spot too. Adell was probably good value / risk. I don't recall Newcomb's ranking at draft time, but i recall being happy with the selection. Then again, i like as much pitching as possible. -
The Official 2024 Draft Thread
Angels in 2030 replied to Dave Saltzer's topic in LA Angels | MLB Daily
Unfortunately, that's NOT been the Angels 1st round drafting MO for what seems like a long while now and across multiple GMs. -
The dude is an Angels apologist. He can't handle any negative comment or judgement against the team. Anyone who does, he has to constantly go after them. No objectivity. Weak individual but that's his choice.
-
Can Schanuel be competent in 2024?
Angels in 2030 replied to m0nkey's topic in LA Angels | MLB Daily
He should have been in the minors. Bringing him up last year near the end is a whatever -- give him a taste is fine, i guess. But dude has always needed to be in the minors and further develop as a hitter before moving onto the majors. Too much forcing things by this FO. Microwaving BBQ ribs/pork. -
Metrics for Success first 20 games
Angels in 2030 replied to Swordsman78's topic in LA Angels | MLB Daily
This is not a good team. Not even an average team. It'll be a bottom 5-10 of the league result. You know what -- i'm perfectly good with that. Signing some expensive FAs would not have mattered. This team needs to go full youth movement (which they appear to be doing) and rebuild with an aim for contending in 2-3+ years. Build the scouting (US & Int'l) and development departments. Sell some vets or guys not in the LT plans at the TDL. Get some good, high draft picks and international signings. If that's the plan....i'm pretty happy about it and excited for the LT. Now about that Owner -- GHTFO and sell this team ASAP....and then we'll really be in good shape going forward. -
Exactly. Each year this team sucks even with huge performances from Trout & Ohtani. As the season goes along, the lack of depth is on full display with very little bench and farm system available to get thru the long 162 season. The lack of producing any stars is obvious. But even more telling is simply good depth players available and on hand when injuries occur. You can twist the narrative all you want to make excuses for the Angels and be a homer. "Gotta support the team!" -- as Puddy would say on Seinfeld. But we have 10 years of data -- facts are facts. Hopefully, one day soon, we can put that behind us and get back to the Stoneman days of true farm system building and player development. It requires a sea change though. This organization will linger in apathy/insignificance until then.
-
MLB Network Radio: Arte about to sell?
Angels in 2030 replied to The Ghost of Bob Starr's topic in LA Angels | MLB Daily
Cuban did just sell a majority of the Mavs. I thought that was more due to him wanting to spend more time and money in other businesses. But maybe it was to invest in a baseball team. I don’t really care who the new owner will eventually be once Arte is gone. I’d just like Arte gone. -
I addressed that. Look at talent under 25 or 23. Where do the Angels stand objectively without your Angel glasses on. I’m open to hearing I’m wrong. I want to be wrong. show me a respected person/publication showing we have top 15 young talent (25 under). who is out best young guy? Where in the league would our top young guy rank objectively compared to all of baseball under 26 (or even 23 less)? Objectively. Even if I’m right, it doesn’t mean going forward these Angel guys won’t turn out better than hype others or guys starting their young careers off better. But right now, we are behind. I’m sorry if being “that guy” (ie the realistic objective guy) bothers you. Maybe you’d prefer everyone be rah rah angels are the best soccer moms here.
-
LOL ok bud. Keep dreaming if you think that would be top 10-15. Full on homer...but i get it, it's a fan site. But try staying in reality on occasion. If you want to look at it different, evaluate teams on 23 or 25 and below talent. It's not good. A few solid players, sure. Stars/elite players -- no way. Certainly well below par compared to the league. Plus, you could play that same game with every team. They all have guys advancing and/or traded.
-
It's hard to imagine a worse farm system than the Angels. I don't know other teams farm system -- so can't say for sure. But really, when you get down to the bottom 3-5 teams, it's an argument of whose poo stinks worse. The good news is turning it around can be done very quickly and has been done many times by teams. A very good 1-2 drafts and the right trades (when selling) can turn your farm fortunes around VERY quick. That's where not selling on Ohtani was such a monumental mistake. That also seems to have impacted some of the drafting -- being more conservative with picks. I hope the mindset changes starting with this next draft and trades during the season (sellers). It's time for the Angels FO/ownership to see reality and where they are compared to the league.
-
It’s time we consider signing Trevor Bauer
Angels in 2030 replied to Hufflepuff's topic in LA Angels | MLB Daily
It's honestly scary how someone can hear the facts involved with the case and yet still side 100% with girl and 100% against Bauer. -
What Middle schoolers are still using elmers glue during classes? Isn't that a kindergarten & an early elementary school thing. Maybe my kids are just smarter & more advanced than some others lol
-
What the Angels need to do to be competitive for a Wild Card.
Angels in 2030 replied to Hubs's topic in LA Angels | MLB Daily
Move to AAA -
I like this move. Let's be honest, we're not swimming in the ocean...we're in the kiddies pool. There is only so much Min can do right now. It's a very risky move -- both a RP and his limited recent turnaround success. But that's the option in the kid pool. It's better than some $250-300M risk. If he goes bad, ok it's not a killer. If he is the real deal, fantastic -- you have him for three years. Which means could also trade him eventually down the road for a big return as a seller. Min needs to take these types of risks...smaller, but potentially big returns.