Mike Scioscia to interview for Padres managerial position?

[rafibomb]

 

 

[failos]

He should be the manager for the Angels

[Jason]

I hope he’s successful with them 

[jsnpritchett]

[jsnpritchett]

37 minutes ago, failos said:

He should be the manager for the Angels

[tdawg87]

4 minutes ago, jsnpritchett said:

[Torridd]

45 minutes ago, rafibomb said:

 

 

I'm a bit torn. I think we have a good manager, but I feel funny with Scioscia on another team after all the history with the Angels.

[Jason]

38 minutes ago, Torridd said:

I'm a bit torn. I think we have a good manager, but I feel funny with Scioscia on another team after all the history with the Angels.

At least it’s an NL team 

[AngelStew43]

About time.  The Padres would become a very dangerous group with Scioscia managing.

[ScottT]

59 minutes ago, AngelStew43 said:

About time.  The Padres would become a very dangerous group with Scioscia managing.

They already are.

[T.G.]

I hope he lands the job.

[Taylor]

3 hours ago, jsnpritchett said:

 

3 hours ago, tdawg87 said:

 

2 hours ago, cals said:

 

[nando714]

Padres a lock for 77-85 next few seasons

god the pedestal you people put the big catorce on…

[Stradling]

31 minutes ago, nando714 said:

Padres a lock for 77-85 next few seasons

god the pedestal you people put the big catorce on…

He’s the best this team has had and it really isn’t close.  Seeing how bad Maddon is just reminds me how good Scioscia was. 

[ScottT]

Imagine if Scioscia never had Rodriguez, Donnelly, and Weber.

Don't get me wrong.  I give him a lot of credit for managing his bullpen how he did that year.

But he didn't build that bullpen.   He didn't draft Salmon, Anderson, and Percival.   Maybe his presence allowed the best or last best years of Kennedy, Spiezio, Fullmer, Washburn, and Ortiz.

Nah.

You people lost your minds 19 years ago.

[tdawg87]

Most people here were glad to see Scioscia gone, myself included. We've just had two progressively worse managers and our current one actively sabotages games with his decisions, so it puts things into perspective.

Revisionist history to claim people "put him on a pedestal". 

We needed to move on, we just picked two shit guys to replace him. 

[Revad]

1 hour ago, tdawg87 said:

Most people here were glad to see Scioscia gone, myself included. We've just had two progressively worse managers and our current one actively sabotages games with his decisions, so it puts things into perspective.

Revisionist history to claim people "put him on a pedestal". 

We needed to move on, we just picked two shit guys to replace him. 

Hell, Stoneman wasn’t perfect but I’d take him back.  Looking at a manager’s in-game choices is one thing (btw these folks know more about baseball than I do) but evaluation of manager and general manager should also be considered as a group effort.  The roster impacts the manager’s choices and presumably the managers use of the roster impacts future construction of it.

[Taylor]

6 hours ago, ScottT said:

You people lost your minds 19 years ago.

[Lhalo]

I’ll take Shildt over Scioscia any day of the week. 

[Hubs]

Shildt and Scioscia are both good options for the young Padres team.

[Angel Oracle]

14 hours ago, ScottT said:

They already are.

Aside from that 11-31 finish to the season