Jump to content
  • Welcome to AngelsWin.com

    AngelsWin.com - THE Internet Home for Angels fans! Unraveling Angels Baseball ... One Thread at a Time.

    Register today to join the most interactive online Angels community on the net!

    Once you're a member you'll see less advertisements. Become a Premium member and you won't see any ads! 

     

Holy Hell, Trevor Bauer 2.0!


Recommended Posts

17 hours ago, ten ocho recon scout said:

Im just assuming here, but i think her attorney saw dollar signs, and assumed there would be a pay out.

 

16 hours ago, cals said:

And BINGO was his name-o. 

So, Bauer is actually a victim of a money-grabbing, bottom-dwelling attorney.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Judge just denied the request for a restraining order.

  • 'PETITIONER WANTED MORE OF A RELATIONSHIP'

    The judge said the "petitioner wanted more of a relationship with the respondent."

    "Her fear that the respondent might do something knowing she was in the hospital had no factual basis."

    In this case the court finds there is no suppotedly evidence that Baeur would cause any harm or even have content with her.

  • 'DECLARATION WAS MATERIALLY MISLEADING'

    "The court finds that the declaration was materially misleading, she claimed that the respondent was calling texting non stop for two weeks, the reality was that respondent rarely called," they judge said.

    Ms Hill testified that she was stressed and anxious when he did and didn't send messages.

    "That's not rational," judge said, adding that she pursued him.

     

    'INJURIES SHOWN IN THE PHOTOGRAPH ARE TERRIBLE'

    They were consequences of the acts which she DID consent to, including being choked, judge says.

    Judge says he didn't force her to have rough sex, and he didn't threaten her afterwards.

    "Let me be clear, the injuries shown in the photograph are terrible," the judge said. But she says Bauer didn't exceed the limits Ms Hill set.

    'WHAT DID PETITIONER CONSENT TO'

    Judge says the next question is "what did the petitioner consent to."

    In written communication she said she wanted to be choked out.

    "When a woman says no she should be believed, so what about when she says yes. Petitioner says she did not consent to being punched, having black eyes and being hospitalized," the judge said.

    IT WAS DATING RELATIONSHIP

    She said there is no research uncovered which decides what the word frequent means in the dating relationship.

    "In this case, the dating relationship was at most tenuous" the judge said.

    The court finds that while a close call, it was a dating relationship. It falls within the legislature.

    NEED TO DEFINE IF DATING RELATIONSHIP

    "Let me first start by thanking the attorneys for the quality of their presentation," the judge said.

    She said she will start the analysis by talking about the family code.

    They do not have to find a probability of future abuse, she says. And they need to define whether it was a dating relationship.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Lhalo said:

Best line I've ever heard from a judge.

“We consider in a sexual encounter that when a woman says no she should be believed,” Gould-Saltman said, “so what should we do when she says yes?”

https://ktla.com/news/local-news/l-a-judge-denies-woman-restraining-order-against-trevor-bauer/

That's smart Jewish woman speak for "she's a whore".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ok, if he didn’t exceed her limits, whatever but that’s the permanent restraining order, I think.  More to come, and it does look like she was really, really kinky but as a man, even if it’s a causal lover, don’t you want what’s good for your parter?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Revad said:

Ok, if he didn’t exceed her limits, whatever but that’s the permanent restraining order, I think.  More to come, and it does look like she was really, really kinky but as a man, even if it’s a causal lover, don’t you want what’s good for your parter?

pedro-monkey-puppet.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...