Jump to content
  • Welcome to AngelsWin.com

    Join The Internet Home for Angels fans today! We're Unraveling Angels Baseball ... One Thread at a Time.

  • AngelsWin.com's Charity of the Month

Angels Should Trade for David Price


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 98
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

I never wanted Odorizzi but at this point I'd be thrilled to get him. That said, I don't see them adding a FA guy unless they trade Heaney.

Personally, I doubt the Dodgers trade David Price though. The Dodgers don't trade away surplus value, they hoard it, even to the point of putting top prospects in AAA when they clearly don't belong th

Yes, I believe they should.

Posted Images

5 minutes ago, floplag said:

Yeah that must be it, lol 

I mean, you literally do this every single time you have a discussion with someone. 

"I'm done arguing. Enjoy your ________."

It's dumb. Either own up to being wrong, or stand your ground. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, tdawg87 said:

I mean, you literally do this every single time you have a discussion with someone. 

"I'm done arguing. Enjoy your ________."

It's dumb. Either own up to being wrong, or stand your ground. 

He always takes his ball and goes home. (no perv)

It's his go-to move. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Erstad Grit said:

Hell no on Price.

Odorizzi is better if we still need a SP. Who knows what the heck our GM is thinking at this point. 

 

If you just took Prices contract with no prospect attached doesn’t make sense over Odorozzi. But if you get Keibert Ruiz and give up a nice prospect package for both but don’t have to trade them back Detmers and/or one of the outfielders (likely Adams) I’d be all over Price.

Link to post
Share on other sites

people realize that Price turns 36 in August right?  Oh and he didn't pitch last year.  Oh and he threw 107 innings in 2019.  Based on what we've seen so far, do we really think the Dogs would give up a prospect to get rid of him?  Or just eat the money.  They clearly don't care about how much they spend.  They're not getting rid of him unless they get a good deal.  

Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Hubs said:

That would look like this 

7B92FBF8-0F64-4651-889E-8ACACB0F81C1.png

I’d rather take on Price and Ruiz for lower level minor leaguers than get Gray, Ruiz, and Price for Marsh. 
 
You could probably line up a trade for just Gray, but they wouldn’t move him for Betts, so it’s unlikely they move him 

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Dochalo said:

people realize that Price turns 36 in August right?  Oh and he didn't pitch last year.  Oh and he threw 107 innings in 2019.  Based on what we've seen so far, do we really think the Dogs would give up a prospect to get rid of him?  Or just eat the money.  They clearly don't care about how much they spend.  They're not getting rid of him unless they get a good deal.  

I just want the catcher of the future, if they can do it, it’s worth picking up Price’s contract, which will save them like $18 M this year but also $20 M next year. They are currently 30M over the cap, probably hard to squeeze under but next year Seager is a free agent, so they can’t reset, and will pay tax again. This gives them money to pay Turner this season.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




×
×
  • Create New...