The USPS

[tdawg87]

45 minutes ago, st1ckboy said:

I never look at the label other than for my name to make sure it's mine. I also get notifications from my phone so I never use the tracking feature. 

There should be a big label right next to "Big Black Dildo" that's pretty hard to miss.

[St1ck]

5 minutes ago, tdawg87 said:

There should be a big label right next to "Big Black Dildo" that's pretty hard to miss.

I always buy those in person. Have to make sure it fits.

[Redondo]

3 hours ago, gotbeer said:

Amazon delivers on Sunday.

Yes, but who delivers it?

Jason says USPS delivers on Sunday.

Amazon has their own drivers?

Edited September 1, 2020 by Redondo

[St1ck]

9 minutes ago, Redondo said:

Yes, but who delivers it?

Jason says USPS delivers on Sunday.

Amazon has their own drivers?

 

[gotbeer]

11 minutes ago, Redondo said:

Yes, but who delivers it?

Jason says USPS delivers on Sunday.

Amazon has their own drivers?

What stick said.  Yes, they have their own drivers.  Especially in high population areas.  

If you look on your orders, and hit tracking.  You should be able to tell if the chances of your package getting lost are high going through usps.  It'll either say Amazon with a TBA#, UPS with a 1Z#, Fed Ex (not sure their numbering system), or USPS with all #'s.

[Redondo]

We don't have those here, but there is a large distribution center in North Las Vegas so they could bring it down in those trucks.

Sometimes it looks like private vehicles deliver here.

Edited September 2, 2020 by Redondo

[Jason]

22 minutes ago, Redondo said:

Yes, but who delivers it?

Jason says USPS delivers on Sunday.

Amazon has their own drivers?

They’re in a US mail Jeep thing

[Redondo]

50 minutes ago, Jason said:

They’re in a US mail Jeep thing

Who would ever have ever thought they would deliver on Sundays?

[Tank]

9 hours ago, Redondo said:

Amazon here.

Small stuff USPS.

Bigger stuff UPS or Fedex.

I get deliveries on Sunday also. Not sure who does that.

 

Same here.

[Taylor]

This is your weekly reminder that mail-in voting does not result in widespread voter fraud.

[Lou]

2 minutes ago, Taylor said:

This is your weekly reminder that mail-in voting does not result in widespread voter fraud.

How do you know?

[Taylor]

3 minutes ago, Lou said:

How do you know?

Feel free to read through the rest of this thread, as well as other topics where this has been discussed. In a nutshell, there's just as much evidence that the world is flat as there is that mail-in voting leads to widespread voter fraud.

[Lou]

1 minute ago, Taylor said:

Feel free to read through the rest of this thread, as well as other topics where this has been discussed. In a nutshell, there's just as much evidence that the world is flat as there is that mail-in voting leads to widespread voter fraud.

Most fraud goes undetected.

[Jason]

Just now, Taylor said:

Feel free to read through the rest of this thread, as well as other topics where this has been discussed. In a nutshell, there's just as much evidence that the world is flat as there is that mail-in voting leads to widespread voter fraud.

If someone wanted to commit fraud then which method would be easiest for them to do so? I'll also add that there is no reason for universal mail in ballots. 

[Jason]

https://nypost.com/2020/08/29/political-insider-explains-voter-fraud-with-mail-in-ballots/

Obviously anything from an anonymous source is shady at best but this does explain how easily it could be done if someone wanted to make it happen. 

[Taylor]

47 minutes ago, Jason said:

https://nypost.com/2020/08/29/political-insider-explains-voter-fraud-with-mail-in-ballots/

Obviously anything from an anonymous source is shady at best but this does explain how easily it could be done if someone wanted to make it happen. 

How it "could" be done. The guy claims that nursing homes had nurses who were paid operatives. It sounds like a conservative conspiracy/deep state wet dream. Also, much of his operation involved in-person voting. Should we also cancel in-person voting?

Also, you know I had to do it. The NY Post is not a reputable news source.

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/new-york-post/

 

[Jason]

1 minute ago, Taylor said:

How it "could" be done. The guy claims that nursing homes had nurses who were paid operatives. It sounds like a conservative conspiracy/deep state wet dream. Also, much of his operation involved in-person voting. Should we also cancel in-person voting?

Also, you know I had to do it. The NY Post is not a reputable news source.

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/new-york-post/

 

You missed the point. If someone wanted to fuck with ballots then the universal mail in ones would be the easiest to manipulate as there is less security with them. The stuff in this article may or may not  have actually happened but it seems plausible. Why even take the chance? I’m not sure why the left is willing to die on this hill. If you want to vote by mail then request your absentee ballot. Does it make sense to send Adam a ballot unless he has suddenly become gay?

[tdawg87]

1 hour ago, Lou said:

Most fraud goes undetected.

Which is why the right knows all about it. 

[Lou]

4 minutes ago, tdawg87 said:

Which is why the right knows all about it. 

And the left is wrong about fraud not making an impact on an election. 

[tdawg87]

22 minutes ago, Lou said:

And the left is wrong about fraud not making an impact on an election. 

But if it goes undetected, how would you know that?

[angelinkc]

11 minutes ago, tdawg87 said:

But if it goes undetected, how would you know that?

I fucked a lot of chicks that their pops didn’t know I was fucking. The smart ones had a few rules in place to reduce the opportunities and frequency of the fucking. They didn’t wait to catch a Birdseye view of the act to understand the possibility existed. 

[Lhalo]

20 minutes ago, angelinkc said:

I fucked a lot of chicks that their pops didn’t know I was fucking. The smart ones had a few rules in place to reduce the opportunities and frequency of the fucking. They didn’t wait to catch a Birdseye view of the act to understand the possibility existed. 

Best analogy I've seen on AW in a long, long time.

[Lou]

40 minutes ago, tdawg87 said:

But if it goes undetected, how would you know that?

You wouldn't. That's why stating that it has no impact on an election is dumb. 

[tdawg87]

1 minute ago, Lou said:

You wouldn't. That's why stating that it has no impact on an election is dumb. 

So is stating that it does have an impact.

[Lou]

1 minute ago, tdawg87 said:

So is stating that it does have an impact.

I never said that it did. It's unknown, but the libs are stating that it doesn't as if it's a fact.

 

Dumbasses.