Pederson/Stripling deal is DEAD. MOVE ON.

[Chuckster70 20,852]

How come Pages isn't included? 

[T.G. 11,245]

1 minute ago, tdawg87 said:

One of them is almost certainly Marsh.

shut your whore mouth

[Hubs 1,181]

It’s possible there are two prospects in the deal not two prospects from the Angels. We already know that a guy is coming back in Andy Pages.
 

Fabian said it wasn’t a top guy so I’d think it’s more in the 8-12 range. 
 

Think Livan Soto and Deveaux. 

[failos 3,467]

Damn I'm already sick of seeing Andy Pages' name.

[Dochalo 25,022]

this is heading in a direction I'm not liking.  

[Make Angels Great Again 2,935]

Please not Marsh. Please not Marsh.

[gotbeer 10,591]

1 minute ago, Chuckster70 said:

How come Pages isn't included? 

Maybe they took him off when the Angels would give our top prospects?

[Angelsfan1984 1,934]

I'd rather give up 2 prospects in our teens than one of our top 7. I have this feeling that if they are sending Stripling than we are sending someone who can slot into their rotation on the cheap. Barria?

Maybe something like Barria/Devereux/Rengifo for Stripling/Pederson/Pages

[DMVol 2,546]

Just now, Dochalo said:

I understand.  we're definitely giving up someone else in addition to rengifo.  right now it's Pederson, Pages, a mystery pitcher for Rengifo and a mystery prospect.  

And if the "mystery pitcher" is Stripling or Gonsolin, the mystery prospect from the Angels is going to be somebody good, maybe Marsh....if Passan is right that the "mystery pitcher" from the Dogs is a major league pitcher, not sure who else that could be? Dustin May? 

[rottiesworld 65]

The only way I can see price coming here would be with the Red Sox eating some of the salary going to the Dodgers and then Dodgers eating some salary and price coming to the Angels.

[Stradling 27,010]

So can we get Pederson, Stripling and Pages without giving up Marsh?  

[DMVol 2,546]

1 minute ago, Stradling said:

So can we get Pederson, Stripling and Pages without giving up Marsh?  

[Angelsfan1984 1,934]

Just now, Stradling said:

So can we get Pederson, Stripling and Pages without giving up Marsh?  

To be honest id rather just get Pederson and Stripling without giving up more prospect capital than have Pages thrown in.

[Chuckster70 20,852]

2 minutes ago, Stradling said:

So can we get Pederson, Stripling and Pages without giving up Marsh?  

Adams I'm guessing. 

[floplag 3,359]

It was already said last night that it wasnt the top guys, if they are getting 2 i cant see Marsh here.  Adams, maybe, Marsh not so much.
If we do Marsh AND another, that deal shifts to thier favor real fast. 
I still think its more like Rengifo, Knowles/Devereaux/ and maybe a young pitcher, Yan perhaps one of those types.  They dont need ML ready, they are stacked, they need pipeline.
 

[T.G. 11,245]

3 minutes ago, Stradling said:

So can we get Pederson, Stripling and Pages without giving up Marsh?  

[Stradling 27,010]

Just now, floplag said:

It was already said last night that it wasnt the top guys, if they are getting 2 i cant see Marsh here.  Adams, maybe, Marsh not so much.
If we do Marsh AND another, that deal shifts to thier favor real fast. 
I still think its more like Rengifo, Knowles/Devereaux/ and maybe a young pitcher, Yan perhaps one of those types.  They dont need ML ready, they are stacked, they need pipeline.
 

Yes, I know but at the same time these reports are constantly wrong.  

[Warfarin 1,952]

I am guessing it is Adams + SP prospect.

[Vlad27Trout27 967]

Depending on the two prospects that we are giving up, this might not be a bad get for us.

A starting Left field, a prospect that looks like he could be special, a 3/4. 

[Dochalo 25,022]

no way Eppler gives up Marsh in that deal.  Marsh could headline a deal for a front line starter.  Stripling is 30  and while hes been solid, he's not great.  

Marsh, Rengifo and another prospect should be able to get you Matt Boyd.  

[tdawg87 32,007]

I feel like this thread is going to be bumped by Lou in a couple years.

[Vlad27Trout27 967]

Gosh i hope it's not Adams. 

[VariousCrap 2,349]

Getting Stripling for the Angels rotation would be huge.

[m0nkey 4,414]

8 hours ago, Blarg said:

It is funny how you guys make up a name in a trade then all seem to believe that guy is somehow part of the trade. The Dodgers have no reason to give up Stripling in this trade. None. 

 

16 minutes ago, mymerlincat said:

 

 Classic

[tdawg87 32,007]

Just now, Dochalo said:

no way Eppler gives up Marsh in that deal.  Marsh could headline a deal for a front line starter.  Stripling is 30  and while hes been solid, he's not great.  

Marsh, Rengifo and another prospect should be able to get you Matt Boyd.  

Yeah but we're getting Pederson too. And Pages.