Jump to content
  • Welcome to AngelsWin.com

    AngelsWin.com - THE Internet Home for Angels fans! Unraveling Angels Baseball ... One Thread at a Time.

    Register today to join the most interactive online Angels community on the net!

    Once you're a member you'll see less advertisements. Become a Premium member and you won't see any ads! 

     

IGNORED

Looks like Trout got robbed of another MVP?


Recommended Posts

35 minutes ago, JustATroutFan said:

Betts deserves an asterisk right next to his 2018 MVP award.  The other two times in which Trout got robbed of the MVP was in 2012 and 2015, in large part due to some stupid stat like RBI's. 

what's the evidence that betts cheated? I haven't seen anything definitive yet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, SoPas Angel said:

Even if Betts knew every single pitch that was coming, it's still not as egregious at Trout losing out on the 2012 MVP when he put up three and a half more WAR than Miggy (and the Angels had a better record than the Tigers).

Yeah, that was a horrible pick. A big reason why I hate the stupid stat RBI. Tigers played in a lousy division. Garbage division that year. And Judge was robbed of the MVP. If the MVP stood for Most Valuable, Judge would have won. If it was the best player award, he should have won as well. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Are we really bitching about Trout not winning the MVP in a season where another guy hit for the Triple Crown?  Grow up, we don’t always get what we want.  It’s a coin flip and it went to the guy that hit for the Triple Crown a feat that hadn’t been accomplished in 45 years.  He wasn’t wronged, nor were you.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Stradling said:

Are we really bitching about Trout not winning the MVP in a season where another guy hit for the Triple Crown?  Grow up, we don’t always get what we want.  It’s a coin flip and it went to the guy that hit for the Triple Crown a feat that hadn’t been accomplished in 45 years.  He wasn’t wronged, nor were you.  

It’s rooted in RBI’s and batting average. Those are horrible stats to use to argue for best of anything. It’s an arbitrary group of three stats that we now recognize as inferior stats. But they’re still meaningful because some ignoramuses a hundred years ago attached a nifty title to them? Bull.

Trout: .399 OBP, 167 wRC+

Cabrera: .393 OBP, 166 wRC+

The only coin flip is who was better with the bat.  Cabrera was .004 better at hitting, but Trout was .006 better at getting on base. Trout also led in OPS+, fwiw.

Add in defense and base running and it’s nowhere close. The real joke is that Cano had as good a case for second place as Miggy. They tied in fWAR and Cano leads by over a win on bWAR.

Cabrera stole the MVP because voters were stuck in the 1950’s.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Stradling said:

Baseball is rooted in its history, so when a guy wins the Triple Crown for the first time in 45 years I don’t believe it should be diminished by newer more complete stats.  

Trout was the better player on a better team. That impresses me more than RBI. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cabrera's Triple Crown season was overrated. It wasn't even close to being his best season with the bat. And his 2012 season wasn't even close to being the best year by a hitter in the 2010's either. Trout's 2018 season with the bat was way better than Cabrera's 2012 season. RBI, lousy and stupid stat. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, SoPas Angel said:

Even if Betts knew every single pitch that was coming, it's still not as egregious at Trout losing out on the 2012 MVP when he put up three and a half more WAR than Miggy (and the Angels had a better record than the Tigers).

If there was any good that came of that, its that that year, he literally changed baseball.

Up to that point, advanced stats were still an us vs. them thing. And a lot of it was hypothetical.

Trout comes along, is the posterchild for total value. And it coincides, like a hollywood script, with Mcab winning the first triple crown in decades.

So to win the argument, the old school crowd has to resort to anecdotal things, like "one guy led his team to the playoffs" (angels best record w trout). 

More rbi! 

Leadoff vs 3 hitter

More home runs!

More games, hitters park.

Better batting average!

Better obp

 

Trout totally got robbed. 

But he changed 100 years of thinking. Changed it so much that even the old men dont argue it anymore...

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Actually, you know what, I'll do you one better: Trout came 1 steal shy of 50 steals in 2012. If he'd gotten it, he would've been only the third person in baseball history to get a season with at least 30 HR and 50 steals. There have been 10 triple crown winners. 

So, if Trout had gotten that extra steal @Stradling, can I assume you'd agree that Trout deserved the MVP in that case?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Pancake Bear said:

Actually, you know what, I'll do you one better: Trout came 1 steal shy of 50 steals in 2012. If he'd gotten it, he would've been only the third person in baseball history to get a season with at least 30 HR and 50 steals. There have been 10 triple crown winners. 

So, if Trout had gotten that extra steal @Stradling, can I assume you'd agree that Trout deserved the MVP in that case?

 

My point isn’t whether Trout deserved it or Miggy deserves it.  It’s about thinking he got screwed.  Miggy won the triple crown so it’s far from an egregious decision.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...