O AW Libs, Where art Thou?

[saangels]

For the sake of engaging in a philosophical debate by which I hope to learn about the world and other people's opinions I will happily play the liberal for you, MT.  But frankly, the sooner we stop pointing the finger and playing liberal vs conservative, red vs. blue--or rather, black vs white--the sooner we can join forces, find common ground, and hopefully make some serious changes in this country.  We all agree that congress is corrupt, that too much money is influencing politics, that the government is overstepping its bounds...let's start there.  Gay marriage and abortion rights are minor issues in comparison to the potential totalitarian police state we are looking at down the road.  My point is: I think we have a lot more in common than you might think.  The more we haggle over paltry, relatively insignificant issues, the more we play into the pundits hands.

 

p.s. remember the thread a week or so ago that asked loosely what "law" we would change, if given the option?  I never answered because I couldn't decide; but now I know.  It's not a law, per say, but I would do away with the labels "republican" and "democrat" and force politicians to run without labels.  The way things are now people just flock one way or another like herds of cattle.         

[TobiasFunke]

For the sake of engaging in a philosophical debate by which I hope to learn about the world and other people's opinions I will happily play the liberal for you, MT.  But frankly, the sooner we stop pointing the finger and playing liberal vs conservative, red vs. blue--or rather, black vs white--the sooner we can join forces, find common ground, and hopefully make some serious changes in this country.  We all agree that congress is corrupt, that too much money is influencing politics, that the government is overstepping its bounds...let's start there.  Gay marriage and abortion rights are minor issues in comparison to the potential totalitarian police state we are looking at down the road.  My point is: I think we have a lot more in common than you might think.  The more we haggle over paltry, relatively insignificant issues, the more we play into the pundits hands.

 

p.s. remember the thread a week or so ago that asked loosely what "law" we would change, if given the option?  I never answered because I couldn't decide; but now I know.  It's not a law, per say, but I would do away with the labels "republican" and "democrat" and force politicians to run without labels.  The way things are now people just flock one way or another like herds of cattle.         

I don't know whether to read this sentence with Battle Hymn of the Old Republic playing in the background or some AnarchoPunk band

[Angelsjunky]

All the libs are off doing satanic yoga postures.

 

And Adam, mt was asking about "liberals" not "lesbians."

[Brandon]

Lesbians or housewives?

[vlad27]

Liberals are genetic mutants.

Always a good conversation starter.

genetic mutants are awesome - who doesn't like X-men?

[Crampknees]

MT, there are still more libs here than there are in Texas so it isn't as bad as it may seem. 

[fureousangel]

You rang?

[Taylor]

On 5/31/2013 at 9:08 AM, Adam said:

Prolly at the coffee house

Your jokes were a lot tamer back then. Today, you'd say something like, "Prolly getting their penises waxed to prove they're lesbians."

[Taylor]

On 6/1/2013 at 8:18 PM, Taylor said:

 

Liberals are too busy playing soccer with their cats.

Update:

Cats - awesome.

Soccer - still gay.

[Adam]

1 hour ago, Taylor said:

Your jokes were a lot tamer back then. Today, you'd say something like, "Prolly getting their penises waxed to prove they're lesbians."

This is what marriage and family does to a man