Jump to content
  • Welcome to AngelsWin.com

    AngelsWin.com - THE Internet Home for Angels fans! Unraveling Angels Baseball ... One Thread at a Time.

    Register today to comment and join the most interactive online Angels community on the net!

    Once you're a member you'll see less advertisements. If you become a Premium member and you won't see any ads! 

     

IGNORED

Tommy La Stella


Recommended Posts

9 minutes ago, Angel Oracle said:

How soon before Rengifo is ready?

Meantime, we all could use some Stella Artois to numb the frustration over watching him try to hit.

I don’t see how Rengifo and Ward could have done any worse so far than La Stella and Cozart. At least they are young with upside and we could have seen what we had with them, Fletch could have been the utility guy. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, Stradling said:

Ok, so math won’t tell you if a player will perform but your eyes will, got it.  We have seen that Fletcher doesn’t like taking a walk, we have seen that in the majors during his short time and we saw it in the minors.  

 

Yes.  Numbers are valuable, but when you have two similar players, you gotta trust what you see.  You have to look at small details of the game, their mental makeup, and if they bring something to the table. La Stella's ridiculous cutoff the other night wont show up in anyone's stats.  It's not an error.  But it's a huge indicator that shouldn't be ignored. On the other hand Fletch beating the shift against the dodgers in the freeway series is a positive that shouldn't be ignored.  But you won't find it in the stats.

The walk thing is a fair point. And that's probably Fletch's weakest point outside of his obvious lack in power.  But becoming more patient as a hitter is something that he can develop.  We're acting like he's stuck at a 5% walk rate. But even with his lack of patience, La Stella doesn't have the upside to justify him getting a platoon job.  

 

And no this switch wouldn't fix us being 1-3.  But it's something that bugs me as a fan of the team and fan of Fletcher.  Any way you slice it, we just have to try to stay alive until Ohtani's back. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, OCAngelsNotLAA said:

We had 3 hits opening day and La Stella had one of them.  To sit him the very next game might send the wrong message.  I would rather reward the players that perform than to stick to a strick platoon.  But then again, interupting that r throw from Kole to second could have garnered a benching on its own.

These are professional baseball players -- those sorts of messages exist more in the heads of fans than they do in the clubhouse.   If anything, given the fact that the organization claims to be trying to be moving more towards an analytics based process, then they are undermining their self proclaimed intent by ignoring data to try to give a player what amounts to an "atta-boy".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, AngelsFaninGA said:

It's pretty much written into the league rules at this point that every year the Angels are required to give 200+ PA's to at least one horrifyingly awful player for no reason (Espinosa, Joyce, Valbuena, La Stella, etc). 

F'n Scioscia

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, OCAngelsNotLAA said:

We had 3 hits opening day and La Stella had one of them.  To sit him the very next game might send the wrong message.  I would rather reward the players that perform than to stick to a strick platoon.  But then again, interupting that r throw from Kole to second could have garnered a benching on its own.

That was his only hit in the three games he played in.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, RBM said:

But Eppler already made a move. The wrong move IMO. He replaced Fletcher with La Stella. Fletcher was proficient last year. La Stella is a career bench player but Eppler decided he was suddenly a starting second baseman. Fletcher is probably more suited as a utility guy but he is much more capable than La Stella.

They are both going to play. They didn’t send Fletcher to Siberia. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, RBM said:

I said this on another post. It appears the decision Eppler made is to platoon them with La Stella getting most of the starts. I believe that is wrong. La Stella is a bench player/spot starter. He’s has had 96 starts in the last four years so about one per week. Now he’ll get 4-6 per week? Not good. 

I wouldn’t make that assumption based on 4 games. Ausmus said clearly that Fletcher would play against some RHs too. Let it play out and see what happens. 

The bottom line, for me, is the players are similar and it appears both will get significant playing time, so let’s see what happens. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, RBM said:

Jeff, this thread was started by Doc discussing La Stella not looking like an MLB starter. I agree and don't think he should be starting or in a platoon. He would have been fine as a Lefty bench guy and a spot starter. There are/were other options. My hope is that Rengifo kills it in SLC and takes the job in May.

There are a lot of guys who start in the majors but aren’t ideal starters.

If you have one or two below average starters, you’re still pretty good. If you have four or five, you’re in trouble. 

I think the Angels were hoping that some combination of La Stella-Fletcher-Ward-Rengifo could make an average MLB starter at 2B/3B. At the moment that seems optimistic, but there’s a long way to go. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...