2020 Democratic Field

[angelinkc]

Just now, st1ckboy said:

Not everyone falls into your pre conceived stereotypes.

I could care less if he likes soccer. It isn't pre conceived based on my mexican family and the tv ratings for univision.

[tdawg87]

23 minutes ago, angelinkc said:

Is it more morally correct to vote for someone to force them to give it up? What has anyone done to deserve another individuals money

Work.

[angelinkc]

Just now, Lou said:

Yes, I'm Hispanic and straight.

Be very proud of that

[tdawg87]

Just now, angelinkc said:

I could care less if he likes soccer. It isn't pre conceived based on my mexican family and the tv ratings for univision.

Ok this might be the greatest post in AW history.

[angelinkc]

11 minutes ago, Catwhoshatinthehat said:

I’d love to be a fly on the wall when cals and angelinkc inevitably get together for a beer. I imagine there’s a moment when even cals thinks something said goes too far then he remembers he’s a lawyer and that isn’t possible. 

and it all started with me saying men shouldnt compete in womens sports. I said I supported their right to buttsex. Somehow that was viewed as homophobic

[St1ck]

Let me know when we get back to talking shit on Trump, and Bernie. Until then.

[angelinkc]

6 minutes ago, tdawg87 said:

Work.

you have enough posts over the years that it is almost a second job. Maybe wouldnt need their money with that

[tdawg87]

1 minute ago, angelinkc said:

you have enough posts over the years that it is almost a second job. Maybe wouldnt need their money with that

Face!

[Jason]

29 minutes ago, st1ckboy said:

What the hell is going on? Why are people talking about gay sex in multiple threads?

I think many here are coming out 

[tdawg87]

@Blarg I'm "having a beer" right now. But I'll have you know it's not just any "beer", it's an American Wild Ale brewed with Brettanomyces and over 3000 pounds of Montmorency cherries.

You fuck.

[Adam]

Lol

[Blarg]

Sounds like the perfect drink for those struggling with their gender. 

[Angelsjunky]

@angelinkc if we choose our sexual orientation, I challenge you to test this. Choose to be gay and go out and suck a dick. In fact, what's your address?

[angelinkc]

4 minutes ago, Angelsjunky said:

@angelinkc if we choose our sexual orientation, I challenge you to test this. Choose to be gay and go out and suck a dick. In fact, what's your address?

I could but choose not too. Maybe I am the odd ball. Minus a a few drunk fat girls, I usually can control the urge. If you see a dick and your ass naturally opens up , I apologize for my ignorance. It just hasn't happened to me. 

[angelinkc]

2 minutes ago, calscuf said:

KC, ignore angelsjunky.  He’s the one too lazy to work and trying to take your money so he can stay home and smoke weed and watch gay porno.

Damn, I don't hate gay people. Just hilarious how intolerant the woke crowd can be. Why they get so mad if someone says they take it in the ass? If they enjoy it and it is right by them why does my approval matter so much. If someone  called me a pie eater I wouldnt be offended.

[angelinkc]

Just now, calscuf said:

Brother, I say we go out and get a slice of pie.

All my pie testing was done years ago. I been eating the same one for 20 years now. You have to eat my share. Nowdays I just drink beer and talk about the good old days

[Angelsjunky]

8 minutes ago, angelinkc said:

I could but choose not too. Maybe I am the odd ball. Minus a a few drunk fat girls, I usually can control the urge. If you see a dick and your ass naturally opens up , I apologize for my ignorance. It just hasn't happened to me. 

Here's your confusion: you're conflating two things. One is the "urge," the other is whether or not you give into that urge. The urge is not chosen, but you can choose to give into it.

Wanting to have sex with dudes is not a choice. But having sex with them is.

[tdawg87]

cals has obviously created an alt account.

[angelinkc]

1 minute ago, Angelsjunky said:

Here's your confusion: you're conflating two things. One is the "urge," the other is whether or not you give into that urge. The urge is not chosen, but you can choose to give into it.

Wanting to have sex with dudes is not a choice. But having sex with them is.

replace urge with sinful lust and I will agree. I have never had the urge to fuck a dude but I get the urge to gamble often. Luckily I learned from others mistakes and my own that gambling might be bad for me. Weather it is drugs or sex  many people struggle with things. Giving in and demanding public acceptance of those sins is not usually the best answer. I am still not the judge but I believe there is one.

[Angelsjunky]

6 minutes ago, angelinkc said:

replace urge with sinful lust and I will agree. I have never had the urge to fuck a dude but I get the urge to gamble often. Luckily I learned from others mistakes and my own that gambling might be bad for me. Weather it is drugs or sex  many people struggle with things. Giving in and demanding public acceptance of those sins is not usually the best answer. I am still not the judge but I believe there is one.

Is all lust sinful or just homosexual lust? But more to the point, you can have your religious beliefs ("sinful lust") but why apply it to anyone else but yourself? Only religious fundamentalists, as far as I can tell, see homosexuality as sinful or wrong. Isn't the whole point of America that people of different races, cultures, ideologies, and belief systems co-exist together peacefully? Why not just live and let live?

How about this idea: lust is just lust. It is only "sinful" if it causes suffering. Why would you  care if two dudes, say @tdawg87 and @calscuf, wanted to cram their junk inside each other? If calscuf blows his load deep inside the rectum of tdawg, and tdawg likes it (as he  would, being a bottom), why does it bother you or are you worried about their eternal damnation?

Edited February 24, 2020 by Angelsjunky

[angelinkc]

9 minutes ago, calscuf said:

Tdawg, please don’t be alarmed but I got like a half chub reading this.

It is ok if you cant control it

[mtangelsfan]

This conversation should be happening in the soccer forum

[Tank]

10 hours ago, JarsOfClay said:

 

He's cancelling student loan debt for everyone. And he's paying for it by taxing wall street - not you.

I continue to be amazed at how many people cite this point without understanding that those costs will be passed along to consumers, as if Wall Street businesses will just simply absorb those new taxes all by themselves.

[angelinkc]

1 minute ago, Tank said:

I continue to be amazed at how many people cite this point without understanding that those costs will be passed along to consumers, as if Wall Street businesses will just simply absorb those new taxes all by themselves.

Yes and screwing every hard working American that paid their loans, worked their  way through school, or joined the military to pay for college. Our military getting shot at for their gi bill to avoid school debt. Deadbeats everywhere think their shit should be free because a woke teacher told them fashion designing was the future and well worth borrowing 150k.

[Catwhoshatinthehat]

55 minutes ago, Tank said:

I continue to be amazed at how many people cite this point without understanding that those costs will be passed along to consumers, as if Wall Street businesses will just simply absorb those new taxes all by themselves.

Anyone who has taken a basic econ course knows this.  Raise taxes on businesses and they'll pass them on to consumers, cut their workforce, cut hours, cut benefits and if it gets bad enough move somewhere that's more tax friendly.  Implement a wealth tax and it will fall short of whatever projections were touted.  At one time more than a dozen European countries had a wealth tax while only four currently do.  The majority abandoned it when they found found wealth taxes weren't worth trying to enforce and administer.  Some of the people didn't have the money to pay the tax because their wealth was in businesses, homes, art and so on.  Ultimately it generated about 0.2% of GDP which in the US would come out to about 45B or 1% of the 4.45T the federal government spent in 2019 and that 45B is nowhere near enough to pay for the things being tossed around.  With globalization the truly wealth whether we're talking businesses or individuals can more easily take their businesses and wealth elsewhere if things got bad enough.