Jump to content
  • Welcome to AngelsWin.com

    AngelsWin.com - THE Internet Home for Angels fans! Unraveling Angels Baseball ... One Thread at a Time.

    Register today to comment and join the most interactive online Angels community on the net!

    Once you're a member you'll see less advertisements. If you become a Premium member and you won't see any ads! 

     

IGNORED

2020 Democratic Field


Recommended Posts

20 minutes ago, UndertheHalo said:

@st1ckboy, what makes you think that a Bennett or like Liz Warren have more *achievable* policy goals then Sanders ? 

It doesn't say it on the link I'm providing, but he talked about it during one of the debates. His is more of an op-in system, rather than blowing up the current system. Is it more achievable, I don't know, that obviously depends on the make up big Congress. Doesn't matter anyway, because I think dude is polling at 1%

https://www.bennet.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/health-care

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, st1ckboy said:

It doesn't say it on the link I'm providing, but he talked about it during one of the debates. His is more of an op-in system, rather than blowing up the current system. Is it more achievable, I don't know, that obviously depends on the make up big Congress. Doesn't matter anyway, because I think dude is polling at 1%

https://www.bennet.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/health-care

 

I disagree with the idea that an opt in system is more desirable, but assuming that were true.  What makes you think that the obstacles that in the way of Medicare 4 all wouldn’t immediately fall into place for this other plan ?

the conservatives won’t meet you in the middle on this.  Or anything.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, tdawg87 said:

How do you get votes? 

You campaign. You run ads. You contact Putin. A guy like Bloomberg doesn't have a base of support. He just has a huge bank account. So regardless of whether anyone supports him or not, he gets to run ads for his campaign because he already had the money. 

Bernie gets to run ads because he has supporters. Supporters who made contributions because they want him to be President. Bernie has money. He could easily dip into his own wallet to increase his campaign funds, but he doesn't. Again, that doesn't make him a better person, it just means he's not using his wealth to get votes. 

What you "money is money" turds fail to understand is that whatever money has been donated to Bernie is going directly to his campaign. It is not, nor has it ever been, HIS money. Any talk of "luxurious spending" or bullshit like that is conjecture. "But he's using it to try to become President! He's using those funds for himself." I mean, unfortunately campaigns need money. It's the way it is. The more you have, the better your chances. But I'll argue he's using those donations for his supporters. They want him to be President. These are people donating their money because they believe in Sanders and think he will help make this country and therefore their lives, better. 

If Bernie becomes President and turns out to be just another selfish politician, then yeah. Fuck him and fuck any other "movement". But I don't think that's the case. 

Thank you, that was the point I was the point I was trying to make.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, UndertheHalo said:

I disagree with the idea that an opt in system is more desirable, but assuming that were true.  What makes you think that the obstacles that in the way of Medicare 4 all wouldn’t immediately fall into place for this other plan ?

the conservatives won’t meet you in the middle on this.  Or anything.  

I don't think it will immediately fall into place. I think it's the more realistic of the two though. I think everyone should have health insurance. Those that can't afford it, should have it provided for them. But we have to be realistic about it. Middle class guy in PA isn't going to want his health insurance that he gets from his employer fucked with.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, st1ckboy said:

I don't think it will immediately fall into place. I think it's the more realistic of the two though. I think everyone should have health insurance. Those that can't afford it, should have it provided for them. But we have to be realistic about it. Middle class guy in PA isn't going to want his health insurance that he gets from his employer fucked with.

I disagree very strongly with all of this.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, UndertheHalo said:

Also, all these guys you’re arguing with aren’t this thick.  They’re just all full of shit.  The moral superiority of not being beholden to a small number of hyper wealthy donors is self evident.  

I see the point you are making and in theory it is better.  Personally I would remove all funding and limit immensely what can be spent on campaigns.  However, in practice I don't think tour argument stands up.  The power and authority to get stuff done in DC is still entirely beholding to monies.  Any candidate once in office has to play ball or they won't get anything done.

not to mention that Bernie has been in office for decades, he has to be in bed with some big money.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, mtangelsfan said:

 

not to mention that Bernie has been in office for decades, he has to be in bed with some big money.

Not really. He doesn’t do anything. He’s just a celebrity spreading a watered down version of a bad ideology

Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, st1ckboy said:

Ok

I’m not trying to avoid the specifics of the topic, I just don’t have time right now to talk about it in detail with you.  I will. 

 

36 minutes ago, mtangelsfan said:

I see the point you are making and in theory it is better.  Personally I would remove all funding and limit immensely what can be spent on campaigns.  However, in practice I don't think tour argument stands up.  The power and authority to get stuff done in DC is still entirely beholding to monies.  Any candidate once in office has to play ball or they won't get anything done.

not to mention that Bernie has been in office for decades, he has to be in bed with some big money.

I’m not going to claim that I know whether he’s ever been in bed with big money donors.  In this election cycle and the last I know that he has not . 

Edited by UndertheHalo
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, UndertheHalo said:

I’m not trying to avoid the specifics of the topic, I just don’t have time right now to talk about it in detail with you.  I will. 

 

 

Oh trust me, I'm good. I really had no desire to get into a debate about healthcare this morning. I didn't want to ignore your post though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, tdawg87 said:

Dude's been in politics for 40 years and has been a social activist since he was in college. But yeah, he's just a celebrity. He's like Trump, but socialism.

Well he’s made a lot of money relative to his investment so it’s a good comparison

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Adam said:

Social Activism is a big business! See Michael Moore

Michael Moore is a fat sweaty Peter Griffin looking ass homo. Bernie was protesting against segregation and getting arrested for it. Michael Moore shouts in the general direction of a megaphone and wears a hat to cover up his greasy Boomer mom hair.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...