Jump to content
  • Welcome to AngelsWin.com

    AngelsWin.com - THE Internet Home for Angels fans! Unraveling Angels Baseball ... One Thread at a Time.

    Register today to comment and join the most interactive online Angels community on the net!

    Once you're a member you'll see less advertisements. If you become a Premium member and you won't see any ads! 

     

IGNORED

Angels Interest in Will Smith and Tony Watson


JAHV

Recommended Posts

7 hours ago, NeverOver said:

If they do trade for Will Smith I could see something like Leonardo Rivas plus one or two lower-tier types or perhaps something like Alex Ramirez plus ??? Something from our #15-25 range plus.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, Dochalo said:

I'd rather not trade prospects for 1yr of a reliever at this point.  

Will Smith might be worth doing so. Seems like he’d be a solid shot at an extension or re-sign candidate since he started in this org and has age on his side. He could trend into a truly dominant arm for the next few seasons. It’s a gamble though. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, totdprods said:

Will Smith might be worth doing so. Seems like he’d be a solid shot at an extension or re-sign candidate since he started in this org and has age on his side. He could trend into a truly dominant arm for the next few seasons. It’s a gamble though. 

I'd rather take a flier on Allen or Holland on a 1yr deal and then sign Smith in the off season.   Unless Eppler feels like he's getting a deal, but I feel like Zaidi would pluck a nice underrated prospect from our system.  Like Stiward or Hector Yan.  It's just not worth it to me considering that Billy has shown the ability to get a Robles or Petit or David Hernandez off waivers.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, Dochalo said:

do you think this kinda stuff leaks for leverage purposes or is it merely random?  

Sometimes it’s for leverage but often it’s just a matter of the media getting incomplete information. 

I think often that reporters get little slivers of information and then “the internet” grows them into much more. 

This entire thread came from one sentence at the bottom of a story that said simply the Angels have been in constant contact with the Giants about these two relievers. That could mean a lot of things. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Jeff Fletcher said:

Sometimes it’s for leverage but often it’s just a matter of the media getting incomplete information. 

I think often that reporters get little slivers of information and then “the internet” grows them into much more. 

This entire thread came from one sentence at the bottom of a story that said simply the Angels have been in constant contact with the Giants about these two relievers. That could mean a lot of things. 

So we're not getting Bumgarner?  

thanks Jeff.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...