Which homer was more important?

[Tank]

4 hours ago, ten ocho recon scout said:

Personally i think gibson is overrated. It was a great moment, for sure. But it was game 1 of 7.

Ive always thought Luis Gonzales' single in 2001 was a way bigger deal, personally.

i'm surprised you didn't say matt williams' double in the 4th inning.

[Tank]

in this discussion, i've always thought gibson's homer was more important simply because it showed eckersley could be hit and it gave a HUGE boost of momentum to the doggies. 

the dodgers had no business winning that series - they were pretty banged up, and the A's were an excellent team. But that one moment in time shifted momentum specifically to the doggies, and it helped propel them to the series win.

fisk's homer was huge - it won game 6 for the bosom and extended the series to game 7 at home. The Reds shook it off pretty well and won an exciting game, and with it, the series.

[m0nkey]

Jesus, I was getting frustrated for Tank reading this thread.  Apparently people talk about whatever they want in whatever thread they want

[cez]

pujols is a homer

[Tank]

7 minutes ago, GOPSnowflakesHateCezero said:

pujols is a homer

one week timeout for you, buster.

[T.G.]

1 hour ago, m0nkey said:

Jesus, I was getting frustrated for Tank reading this thread.  Apparently people talk about whatever they want in whatever thread they want

New here?