Jump to content
  • Welcome to AngelsWin.com

    AngelsWin.com - THE Internet Home for Angels fans! Unraveling Angels Baseball ... One Thread at a Time.

    Register today to comment and join the most interactive online Angels community on the net!

    Once you're a member you'll see less advertisements. If you become a Premium member and you won't see any ads! 

     

IGNORED

2018 Hot Stove League


greginpsca

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, Chuckster70 said:

Eppler is hard at work I'm sure behind the scenes, but damn. It's almost the middle of January and we got shit to do still. 

My fear at this moment today, is that the exact opposite is true.  There is work that could be done, but as we sit our roster is complete.  Anything we do would be an upgrade bumping someone else that im not sure they feel they need to do.  I think the only thing they may be looking at is an experienced reliever to help mature the kids.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, totdprods said:

Not exactly the same scenario, but the Angels pounced on Vlad because everyone was balking due to his back. 

Pujols was surprising, but he seemingly was a big target all along...when you couple it with CJ though, it was quite a statement. 
Hamilton caught me 100% off-guard and he had his share of baggage. Angels took no time going after it quietly there. 

And yeah, the Teixeia, Greinke, and Haren trades, as well as this era's Upton and Simmons deals, all had quite the abruptness to them. 

Truth is, Arte-era Angels really do have a knack for making big, bold moves. And usually not without much indication or expectation from our part. So as unlikely as Harper or Machado are, I do think there is sufficient precedent here that does not rule the Angels lurking on either one.

He said swooping in and signing somebody because they were taking too long to sign.  I can't recall a single time that happened.  Perhaps Vlad qualifies.  Pujols was signed in early December.  Hamilton was mid-December.  Trades aren't signings.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Glen said:

He said swooping in and signing somebody because they were taking too long to sign.  I can't recall a single time that happened.  Perhaps Vlad qualifies.  Pujols was signed in early December.  Hamilton was mid-December.  Trades aren't signings.  

Guerrero at least certainly qualifies. And even though Pujols and Hamilton happened in mid-December, at that point the number of teams genuinely interested had dropped to only a couple. 

http://www.espn.com/mlb/news/story?id=1704992

The Angels were believed to have entered the bidding for
Guerrero only late last week. On Saturday, he turned down a
three-year offer from the New York Mets that would have paid him
$71 million over five years if he reached incentives.

Edited by totdprods
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Stradling said:

Albert was swooped I thought Hamilton was a swoop job. 

I think he was swooped in that nobody expected the angels to meet the price, but it wasn't because he was sitting on the market waiting. I think Glen is referring to the fact that their market Is apparently cold and nobody has snagged them yet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, totdprods said:

Guerrero at least certainly qualifies. And even though Pujols and Hamilton happened in mid-December, at that point the number of teams genuinely interested had dropped to only a couple. 

http://www.espn.com/mlb/news/story?id=1704992

The Angels were believed to have entered the bidding for
Guerrero only late last week. On Saturday, he turned down a
three-year offer from the New York Mets that would have paid him
$71 million over five years if he reached incentives.

It was a sarcastic scenario not a realistic one so there’s the answer to the confusion......

Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, totdprods said:

Not exactly the same scenario, but the Angels pounced on Vlad because everyone was balking due to his back. 

Pujols was surprising, but he seemingly was a big target all along...when you couple it with CJ though, it was quite a statement. 
Hamilton caught me 100% off-guard and he had his share of baggage. Angels took no time going after it quietly there. 

And yeah, the Teixeia, Greinke, and Haren trades, as well as this era's Upton and Simmons deals, all had quite the abruptness to them. 

Truth is, Arte-era Angels really do have a knack for making big, bold moves. And usually not without much indication or expectation from our part. So as unlikely as Harper or Machado are, I do think there is sufficient precedent here that does not rule the Angels lurking on either one.

While on the Vlad discussion, wasn't he one of the latest ever superstar FAs to sign, mid-January 2004?

Harper and Machado have to be getting closer to setting the lateness bar higher. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Angel Oracle said:

Who's left amongst FA relievers and 3B (not Machado) now?

Ottavino, Moose, and ?

That would be impactful?  not much unless we want to pay Kimbrel which i do not.
Alas i think the ship has sailed.  They will try to maybe get one of the SF guys on the cheap in trade and book flights to spring training. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I still think it’s funny whenever anyone throws out stats for a reliever, good or bad. At the end of the day it’s a total freaking crapshoot either way. 

Grab as many relievers as you can without spending a fortune or clogging up the roster. Since we have a good selection of guys who can start in AAA due to options -  Buttrey, Anderson, Pena - then I think they could give vets an opp to displace them to start the year and win jobs in ST like Norris and Petit.

Might be one reason Eppler didn’t do much last season - I think almost all of our relievers and the time were out of options.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Man if we were able to trade for Will Smith and sign Adam Ottavino. I don't think we'd need to make another move. 

Let Cozart, Rengifo, Fletcher, Ward and La Stella battle it out for two spots (2B/3B). We already have a 1B platoon in Bour/Pujols and Ohtani at DH. If Calhoun is the guy of old or close to the guy who came back after his minor league stint last season... We'll be a force to be reckoned with IMO. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, totdprods said:

Again, Bryce Harper had been the anointed savior of baseball since he was in middle school, fat boying out HRs in rich white boy baseball camps and being hyped up in every way possible. It's a wonder he isn't more of a cartoonish smug supervillain like Bonds became.

Trout was good ol' boyin' it up in bumfuck Jersey, everymannin' it as the son of a failed minor leaguer and going below everyone's radar.

Two very different backgrounds. Bryce is like the Anakin Skywalker to Trout's Luke.

Love this.  Sounds like an article from Rolling Stone, circa 1973, comparing Wayne Newton to Springsteen.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

59 minutes ago, Chuckster70 said:

Man if we were able to trade for Will Smith and sign Adam Ottavino. I don't think we'd need to make another move. 

Let Cozart, Rengifo, Fletcher, Ward and La Stella battle it out for two spots (2B/3B). We already have a 1B platoon in Bour/Pujols and Ohtani at DH. If Calhoun is the guy of old or close to the guy who came back after his minor league stint last season... We'll be a force to be reckoned with IMO. 

I’d still make one very minor IF move to maintain some depth. Just needs to be kept cheap and on a short leash. Matt Davidson, Freddy Galvis, or Logan Forsythe-level. Agreed on Smith and Ottavino. 

Someone who on a rebound gives you a much better OBP or SLG capacity than Fletcher or La Stella respectively. Someone easy to cut if not. The long-term IF depth is great right now, but a poorly timed injury or two and we’re putting quite a bit on the shoulders of kids we need to develop properly and for the long-term. 

I also want us to be able to at least consider a deadline deal for help if we’re in good position, and that’s trickier if we’re counting on all the kids. 

Fletcher starting the season at AAA because we rolled the dice on a cheap vet isn’t going to cost us the playoffs. 

Our current projected starting IF (Cozart, Simmons, Fletcher, Bour/Pujols, and Lucroy) had an OPS of...662 last season. 

Color me a little skeptical relying on Taylor Ward, Luis Rengifo, David Fletcher, and Matt Thaiss to save us from that immediately. Ward and Fletcher already failed to top .700 their first time around. Adding one more guy into the mix who feasibly lands at a .700-.750 OPS would go a long way. If you add Moustakas, the collective IF OPS goes from .662 to .718.

Edited by totdprods
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...