Prop 10

[Brandon]

Commercial blitz on this. Tried to read about it because they are showing the same groups saying vote yes followed by a commercial with the same vets saying to vote no.

What's this all about?

Tried reading about this, but each site seems slanted towards one type of vote.

[Make Angels Great Again]

I work for a REIT, and everyone put a "No on Prop 10!" logo on their e-mail signature.

I don't know about you, but that's all the information I require. /s

[Make Angels Great Again]

Real answer though, if you think more restrictive state laws will help the housing crisis you're a Facking moron.

[gotbeer]

Here is a good writeup on it.

https://la.curbed.com/2018/1/12/16883276/rent-control-california-costa-hawkins-explained

Personally, I think this is a way that the government is going to try to force rent control on single family houses.  Because once you give an inch, the government will try to take a mile.

[Schildog]

2 hours ago, Make Angels Great Again said:

Real answer though, if you think more restrictive state laws will help the housing crisis you're a Facking moron.

It's would take away power from the state and give it to local jurisdictions. So I guess you're the facking moron.

[Adam]

Always a good idea to allow men with guns control over what you can do with your property

[Ray McKigney]

If there are stricter rent control laws will that mean poor people can move to my neighborhood?

[Make Angels Great Again]

1 hour ago, Schildog said:

It's would take away power from the state and give it to local jurisdictions. So I guess you're the facking moron.

 

That's...not a very accurate description.

If the prop passes then it removes the handcuffs from the government's ability to control rent. It gives California even more power to exert their tyrannical ideology on people

[Lou]

and people wonder why very few bother to vote 

[Vegas Halo Fan]

Probably the biggest contest in terms of questions on the ballot here is Question 3, which would deregulate the electricity market in Nevada. After saying that they would take no stance on the question, NV Energy (the local electric monopoly) has dumped $30 million into advertising to maintain their stranglehold on electricity. They cite California as an example of what can go wrong when deregulation passes (even talking about Enron). They also have spokespeople (like a teacher of the year) who know jack about the utility industry but who they believe will have credibility with voters. The opponents act as if electric bills will go up overnight by hundreds of dollars for each family, when in reality the question gives the Nevada Legislature five years to craft the laws that will be used to enact it. The laws will have far more bearing on rates than the question itself will. I fear that this measure will fail and we will still be stuck with a monopoly.

[nate]

On 10/4/2018 at 7:35 PM, Adam said:

Always a good idea to allow men with guns control over what you can do with your property

Republicans?

[Adam]

1 hour ago, nate said:

Government?

Yep

[Taylor]

I voted yes. Have at it, cons!

[Adam]

I abstained. Have at it, libcons

[Rico]

No