Jump to content
  • Welcome to AngelsWin.com

    AngelsWin.com - THE Internet Home for Angels fans! Unraveling Angels Baseball ... One Thread at a Time.

    Register today to join the most interactive online Angels community on the net!

    Once you're a member you'll see less advertisements. Become a Premium member and you won't see any ads! 

     

What's the verdict? Has limiting mound visits speeded up the game?


Recommended Posts

Or has it been just another occasion to sell time on TV, like replay's have become?

I found evidence that the length of games actually INCREASED, but that was written in the first two weeks of the season. Replay was the main culprit, followed by the ever-increasing use of the bullpen.

Anybody have anything on this?

I did read that the new intentional walk rule had saved 220 pitches over a two week period, for a grand total savings of 36 minutes spread over all the games in that two week period. I guess that's worth it.

I would still like to see a reliever be forced to pitch to 2-3 batters, barring injury, of course. Not so much for the time saving but for the potential increase in runs. I like late inning rallies;  the recent Mariner sweep not withstanding..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I appreciate cutting down commercial time, and allowing automatic intentional walks, but any other attempts to speed up the game seem futile to me.

Baseball will never be a game tailored to those with a short attention span.  Having said that, the condensed games provided on MLB.tv are a great way to watch a game in around 10 minutes in a manner that won't put you to sleep.

If one really wanted to speed up the game, and have more runs scored, that calls for drastic measures. 2 balls is a walk, 2 strikes is a strikeout. That is essentially starting with a 2-1 count. Then, instead of having 9 innings with 3 outs, you have 7 innings with 4 outs. 28 batters would be the minimum instead of 27.

I would never want to see that happen, but that would certainly be entertaining in an ASG, at least initially.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I’m in favor of speeding the game up.  It’s not really changing the game any more than the game has changed itself.  To answer the OP question the average game is 6 minutes shorter than last year. But go back to 2005 and it was 15 minutes shorter than it is now.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...