Jump to content
  • Welcome to AngelsWin.com

    AngelsWin.com - THE Internet Home for Angels fans! Unraveling Angels Baseball ... One Thread at a Time.

    Register today to comment and join the most interactive online Angels community on the net!

    Once you're a member you'll see less advertisements. If you become a Premium member and you won't see any ads! 

     

IGNORED

Which Angels prospect are you most excited about this season?


Chuck

Most Exciting Angels Prospect to Follow  

46 members have voted

  1. 1. Which Angels prospect are you most excited about this season?

    • Luis Rengifo: .323/.426/.466 w/ 27 walks & 22 stolen bases
      1
    • Jo Adell: .326/.398/.611 w/ 6 HR, 4 SB
      11
    • Taylor Ward: .345/.453/.520 w/ 6 HR (one lost in a rainout), 8 SB *New Position (3B)*
      5
    • Jose Suarez: 2.79 ERA, 69 K's in 38 2/3 innings (leads minors in K's)
      2
    • David Fletcher: .361/.408/.615, 5 HR, 5 SB, 12 BB, 10 K
      1
    • Griffin Canning: 1.49 ERA, 42 K, 36 1/3 innings, .153 BAA
      11
    • Brandon Marsh: .282/.372/.444 3 HR, 4 SB, 25 RBI (promoted to High-A)
      3
    • Jahmai Jones: .250/.360/.393 3 HR, 6 SB *New Position (2B)*
      0
    • Jared Walsh: .275/.365/.604 13 HR, 36 RBI (leads Cal League in HR)
      0
    • Jose Miguel Fernandez: .350/.438/.543 5 HR, 19 BB & just 13 K's.
      2
    • Matt Thaiss: .287/.352/.490 6 HR, 10 doubles (Increased power)
      0
    • All of the above (plus some others Chuck left off the list)
      10


Recommended Posts

I went with Taylor Ward just because he's bat has improved, including the power. That and he's stealing bases. 

Combine all of that with the fact that he's performing well in a position of weakness in this org at third base, I'm excited. 

That said, I'm nearly equally as excited about everyone else on this list. It's just we all thought Ward was a failed 1st round draft pick and at best was a reserve catcher going into this season. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I had to decide between the top 4 options. Nice to see Cron doing well (I always root for homegrown guys when they leave), but much nicer to see the guy we got back coming out of nowhere. I’ve always been a little confused about the Jones hype

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm intrigued by Fernandez. Didn't start with the Angels so could turn out to be a sneaky steal! Would love to see him called up with Kinsler & Valbuena booted. If he can stick that's be great. If not there no harm done and no real investment

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like Fletcher and the over .400 OBP.  We need a developing lead off type badly.  I'm looking forward to Valbuena, Kinsler and Marte all gone in favor of players on this list.  Chuck left off Cowart, I still like him, especially for his versatility.  He's right behind Fletcher in hitting in Salt Lake.  I think he will eventually get it going at the MLB level, and with his defense watch out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, maximus p said:

Voted for Canning, but would have gone with Barria (assuming not on list b/c MLB experience?).

Yeah I left Ohtani, Anderson and Barria off because of their major league time. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, tomsred said:

I like Fletcher and the over .400 OBP.  We need a developing lead off type badly.  I'm looking forward to Valbuena, Kinsler and Marte all gone in favor of players on this list.  Chuck left off Cowart, I still like him, especially for his versatility.  He's right behind Fletcher in hitting in Salt Lake.  I think he will eventually get it going at the MLB level, and with his defense watch out.

Yeah I left off everyone with major league time. 

Which makes this list even better if they were added. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, tomsred said:

I like Fletcher and the over .400 OBP.  We need a developing lead off type badly.  I'm looking forward to Valbuena, Kinsler and Marte all gone in favor of players on this list.  Chuck left off Cowart, I still like him, especially for his versatility.  He's right behind Fletcher in hitting in Salt Lake.  I think he will eventually get it going at the MLB level, and with his defense watch out.

I think there's a very real possibility we can see Fernanez essentially take over for Valbuena and Fletcher for Kinsler.  I think it's safe to assume they can, at least, replicate their current performance levels (a very low bar admittedly) for 19million less per year - not bad ;) 

Marte is performing fine now, so I wouldn't mind hanging onto him for the time being.  He can easily be let go in the future if he does not perform.

Will be interesting to see how Ward ultimately turns out.  Having Cozart is useful, because we could potentially opt for either Fletcher (at 2B) or Ward (at 3B) and have Cozart shift to cover whichever position is unoccupied.

Canning and Suarez are possible bullpen pieces for us at the end of this year, and starting next year, likely starters in our rotation, at least by mid-season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Chuckster70 said:

Yeah I left off everyone with major league time. 

Which makes this list even better if they were added. 

I got it.  It sure would make the list even better.   Then hopefully we get some really great draft choices this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, GrittyVeterans said:

Thaiss for me. Posting solid numbers in a league that is tougher to hit than the PCL. Improved his one major weakness coming into the year (power).

Should be a September call up

I don't think Thasis gets called up this year unless he goes on a prodigious power tear.  Instead, I think it's more likely we could see guys who *have* to be added to the 40-man roster this offseason to protect them from the rule V - guys like Suarez, Ward, Fletcher.  Thasis doesn't need rule V protection until the 2019 offseason.  This helps delay his clock, increases our long-term control, etc...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I went Ward, purely because I'd written him off as a non prospect with the position switch. Could easily have gone Canning given our need for pitching (an extra starter allows a competent arm to move to relief if needed), but the small sample size and walk rate tilts the scale in Ward's favor for me. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, Warfarin said:

I don't think Thasis gets called up this year unless he goes on a prodigious power tear.  Instead, I think it's more likely we could see guys who *have* to be added to the 40-man roster this offseason to protect them from the rule V - guys like Suarez, Ward, Fletcher.  Thasis doesn't need rule V protection until the 2019 offseason.  This helps delay his clock, increases our long-term control, etc...

Good point about the 40 man roster.

However, the stuff about delaying his clock shouldn't matter at all to this team for a player like Thaiss. You do that when you are dealing with a Kris Bryant or a Vladimir Guerrero Jr. type of star prospect. If they think Thaiss can help them win ball games more than say Luis Valbuena or Jefry Marte down the stretch, he'll get called up

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, GrittyVeterans said:

Good point about the 40 man roster.

However, the stuff about delaying his clock shouldn't matter at all to this team for a player like Thaiss. You do that when you are dealing with a Kris Bryant or a Vladimir Guerrero Jr. type of star prospect. If they think Thaiss can help them win ball games more than say Luis Valbuena or Jefry Marte down the stretch, he'll get called up

From your lips to Sosh's marinara-soaked fingers!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, GrittyVeterans said:

Good point about the 40 man roster.

However, the stuff about delaying his clock shouldn't matter at all to this team for a player like Thaiss. You do that when you are dealing with a Kris Bryant or a Vladimir Guerrero Jr. type of star prospect. If they think Thaiss can help them win ball games more than say Luis Valbuena or Jefry Marte down the stretch, he'll get called up

My guess is we might be likely to see Fernandez called up to potentially take on Valbuena's role vs Thasis, at least as far as this season is concerned.  I think Fernandez' bat is more MLB-ready currently at this point, and he does offer some more positional versatility.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...