Jump to content
  • Welcome to AngelsWin.com

    AngelsWin.com - THE Internet Home for Angels fans! Unraveling Angels Baseball ... One Thread at a Time.

    Register today to comment and join the most interactive online Angels community on the net!

    Once you're a member you'll see less advertisements. If you become a Premium member and you won't see any ads! 

     

IGNORED

National Parks


Recommended Posts

http://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2017/10/25/560118955/fees-to-enter-popular-national-parks-would-skyrocket-under-interior-department-p

It will cost $75 to enter the Grand Canyon, Yosemite, and 15 other national parks under this new plan. It's currently $25-30 at most of the popular national parks. I understand that there is a $12 billion backlog for maintenance of the parks, but by making them that expensive, it will probably prevent people from visiting those parks. So I wonder if the revenue would balance out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/25/2017 at 6:45 PM, calscuf said:

Awesome.

National Parks will be less crowded and no poor people!

Maybe, but there will be plenty of old people. In August I bought my lifetime park pass for $10. I met the age requirement by seven months before it went up to $80 (which is still a bargain for lifetime access).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Tank said:

no doubt, but i'm not a fan of camping. maybe that'll change when i retire but for now, meh.

You can experience a National Park without camping. My wife and I have been to several, but only once did we actually camp in one. They can also make for really fun and interesting day trips.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If the money is used towards improving services and infrastructure, you have to look at it. $70 a car for some places is tough, but geez, Yosemite in the summer can be insane. The downside I see though is the national parks shouldn’t be like disneyland, you shouldn’t have to be rich to visit. 

Reservation system might be an idea. Maybe prioritize for US visitors. Damn Germans and French just screw things up anyways. 

They should also be pushing some of the lesser parks as well. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, red321 said:

If the money is used towards improving services and infrastructure, you have to look at it. $70 a car for some places is tough, but geez, Yosemite in the summer can be insane. The downside I see though is the national parks shouldn’t be like disneyland, you shouldn’t have to be rich to visit. 

Reservation system might be an idea. Maybe prioritize for US visitors. Damn Germans and French just screw things up anyways. 

They should also be pushing some of the lesser parks as well. 

LMAO! Have you been to Disneyland in the past 10 years? If the crowd there is considered rich we are in deep shit. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, LHalo said:

You can finance annual passes. I know this because I make monthly payments.

Many of the people there aren't "rich".

We do the same thing. It’s still $1500 or so for a family of four, and your local. 

Don’t take it so literally. The point being the national parks shouldn’t be like an amusement park...unless it’s Bryce and the disaster the surrounding town is. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...