Jump to content
  • Welcome to AngelsWin.com

    AngelsWin.com - THE Internet Home for Angels fans! Unraveling Angels Baseball ... One Thread at a Time.

    Register today to comment and join the most interactive online Angels community on the net!

    Once you're a member you'll see less advertisements. If you become a Premium member and you won't see any ads! 

     

IGNORED

LOL Angeles


Recommended Posts

9 hours ago, gotbeer said:

Hahahhahahahaha.  Dumbshits.  Oh, and there are still plenty of cars parked in Anti Gridlock zones during rush hour, with no tickets or towing.

LA spends more on parking enforcement than it collects in fines

 

Double reinforcing the zippers on the uniform pants is expensive 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, gotbeer said:

Hahahhahahahaha.  Dumbshits.  Oh, and there are still plenty of cars parked in Anti Gridlock zones during rush hour, with no tickets or towing.

LA spends more on parking enforcement than it collects in fines

 

What do they care? Their entire operation and payroll is funded by stolen money anyway

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
33 minutes ago, Jason said:

Lol at “comply with their demands” Gascon is doing and excellent job as the DA there 

That’s pretty standard boilerplate for anyone (law enforcement, employers, etc…) advising people in a robbery scenario. Sucks that there’s an apparent lack of prosecutorial effort there, but I doubt the police department’s official advice to robbery victims is gonna change to “just hit ‘em in the dick and run” anytime soon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Don said:

That’s pretty standard boilerplate for anyone (law enforcement, employers, etc…) advising people in a robbery scenario. Sucks that there’s an apparent lack of prosecutorial effort there, but I doubt the police department’s official advice to robbery victims is gonna change to “just hit ‘em in the dick and run” anytime soon.

The criminals run that city and the citizens are defenseless 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Jason said:

The criminals run that city and the citizens are defenseless 

K. What instructions on how to handle an active robbery would you prefer the police department offer? Tell the citizenry to fight? Tell them to just say no?

I understand criticism/frustration with the PD and the DA in general. That makes sense. But the “don’t be a hero” stance is and has been pretty standard everywhere for quite some time. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Don said:

K. What instructions on how to handle an active robbery would you prefer the police department offer? Tell the citizenry to fight? Tell them to say just say no?

I understand criticism/frustration with the PD and the DA in general. That makes sense. But the “don’t be a hero” stance is and has been pretty standard everywhere for quite some time. 

Actually issue weapons permits for people that want them, prosecute and lock criminals up, stop the zero bail nonsense would be a start. Defending yourself has nothing to do with being a hero. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, Jason said:

Actually issue weapons permits for people that want them, prosecute and lock criminals up, stop the zero bail nonsense would be a start. Defending yourself has nothing to do with being a hero. 

All good ideas. I just don’t think you’ll ever hear a LE agency suggest that its citizen’s risk their lives to stop a property crime. You might be comfortable with that yourself, and maybe knowing more people were armed would give thieves a second thought too.

Again though, no LE agency would ever recommend that as a blanket tactic to its citizenry at large. It’s a safety issue and a liability issue. The vast majority of people wouldn’t know how to effectively resist in that situation (probably even if armed). The goal is for robbery victims not to become murder victims.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Don said:

All good ideas. I just don’t think you’ll ever hear a LE agency suggest that its citizen’s risk their lives to stop a property crime. You might be comfortable with that yourself, and maybe knowing more people were armed would give thieves a second thought too.

Again though, no LE agency would ever recommend that as a blanket tactic to its citizenry at large. It’s a safety issue and a liability issue. The vast majority of people wouldn’t know how to effectively resist in that situation (probably even if armed). The goal is for robbery victims not to become murder victims.

A robbery is not a property crime and they are doing nothing and in fact, they do the opposite of what they need to do to protect people in that city. It’s going to get much worse for LA

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Jason said:

A robbery is not a property crime and they are doing nothing and in fact, they do the opposite of what they need to do to protect people in that city. It’s going to get much worse for LA

Ok. This still doesn’t explain your criticism of the “don’t resist/comply” thing. My point is that you have every reason to be frustrated/angry about local government response to all of this. You just zeroed in on the least problematic part of that response for some reason.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Don said:

Ok. This still doesn’t explain your criticism of the “don’t resist/comply” thing. My point is that you have every reason to be frustrated/angry about local government response to all of this. You just zeroed in on the least problematic part of that response for some reason.

If people just comply it’s going to continue to happen. The people committing the robberies are going to choose soft targets that offer the least resistance. Ultimately the best advice is to avoid going into any of the areas, for any reason, that are listed in this bulletin. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Jason said:

If people just comply it’s going to continue to happen. The people committing the robberies are going to choose soft targets that offer the least resistance. Ultimately the best advice is to avoid going into any of the areas, for any reason, that are listed in this bulletin. 

Statistics show that people who don't comply end up assaulted or dead instead of just having to replace their credit cards. You are being stupid about this. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Blarg said:

Statistics show that people who don't comply end up assaulted or dead instead of just having to replace their credit cards. You are being stupid about this. 

So just keep letting things go the way they are going? That seems stupid to me 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...