Political Gallery

[St1ck]

18 minutes ago, Make Angels Great Again said:

I'm almost sure he's some kind of super SJW artificial intelligence.

You might be on to something here. 

[RallyMo]

It's performance art.

[Lhalo]

33 minutes ago, RallyMo said:

It's performance art.

[Taylor]

5 hours ago, Lhalo said:

I thought Adam had all those photos burned.

[Tank]

4 hours ago, Taylor said:

I thought Adam had all those photos burned.

unfortunately not.

[Adam]

@nate

 

[nate]

[Lhalo]

[cysomeawfulpitcher]

[Lhalo]

[Spirit]

 

[Blarg]

That would be so much funnier if someone animated in her holding a Domino's pizza box. 

[cysomeawfulpitcher]

[Adam]

21 minutes ago, cysomeawfulpitcher said:

Obviously the issue that graph is referring to doesn’t pertain to rape or suicide or mass murder of brown people

[tdawg87]

17 hours ago, Adam said:

Obviously the issue that graph is referring to doesn’t pertain to rape or suicide or mass murder of brown people

It's red because of all the blood.

[tdawg87]

[Blarg]

1/1024 according to their DNA tests. 

[tdawg87]

1 minute ago, Blarg said:

1/1024 according to their DNA tests. 

Eyleesha Warren

[Jason]

1 hour ago, tdawg87 said:

Either it’s photoshopped or they identify as black

[tdawg87]

6 minutes ago, Jason said:

Either it’s photoshopped or they identify as black

I thought "Identifying as _______" was a lib thing?

[Vegas Halo Fan]

1 hour ago, Jason said:

Either it’s photoshopped or they identify as black

Snopes, which independently investigates such things, says that these photos are real.

Is This Photo of a Couple Wearing ‘Blacks for Trump’ Shirts Real?

[Lhalo]

7 hours ago, Vegas Halo Fan said:

Snopes, which independently investigates such things, says that these photos are real.

Ha! Best joke I’ve heard all week. 

Edited January 20, 2020 by Lhalo

[Tank]

10 hours ago, tdawg87 said:

you're looking good, @tdawg87!

[Taylor]

53 minutes ago, Lhalo said:

Ha! Best joke I’ve heard all week. 

Quote

https://www.jacksonville.com/article/20120928/NEWS/801246493

Snopes.com is at the top of that list. An email circulating since 2008 warns not to use Snopes.com because of its political leanings: "I have recently discovered that Snopes.com is owned by a flaming liberal and this man is in the tank for Obama. ..."

Snopes.com is the oldest fact-finder on the Internet. It was well-respected for years when it fact-checked urban legends, such as whether more domestic abuse occurs on Super Bowl Sunday than on any other day. But when Snopes.com starting debunking rumors about candidate-then-President Barack Obama, it was roundly criticized.

Snopes.com is owned and run by David and Barbara Mikkelson of California, who have not hidden their identities as one of the viral email claims. Check out the list that shows this at www.snopes.com/info/articles.asp.

As far as being liberal, other fact-checkers, such as Truthorfiction.com; David Emery, who researches urban legends for the information website About.com; and FactCheck.org have researched Snopes.com and none has found any instance where the Mikkelsons have stated a political preference or affiliation.

Barbara Mikkelson is a Canadian citizen, so she can't contribute to a political campaign or vote in U.S. elections. David Mikkelson provided his voter registration papers to FactCheck.org that show he registered as a Republican in 2000, and had no party affiliation in 2008.

A check of the donor list at the Center for Responsive Politics, which tracks campaign contributions (1990-2012), shows no contributions by Mikkelson to any candidate from any party. You can check yourself at www.opensecrets.org

Some of the emails disparaging Snopes.com cite that TruthorFiction.com is a much more reliable site. TruthorFiction.com lauds Snopes.com as an "excellent" and "authoritative" resource (www.truthorfiction.com/rumors/s/snopes.htm).

Although Snopes.com could do a better job of linking to sources within its stories, it does list its sources, so it is easy to confirm accuracy.

 

[Jason]

14 hours ago, tdawg87 said:

I thought "Identifying as _______" was a lib thing?

What if they are libs that identify as cons? Possibly cons that identify as libs?

Edited January 20, 2020 by Jason