Trumped

[Lhalo]

5 hours ago, UndertheHalo said:

Another fact, there were hardly any counter protestors.  which was good and probably a principal reason for there not being any ruckus.

Gee I wonder why?

[tdawg87]

2 hours ago, Lhalo said:

Gee I wonder why?

You seem to be implying that the counter protesters would be scared of being there. Why would they be scared? Should they have a reason to be?

[Lhalo]

3 minutes ago, tdawg87 said:

You seem to be implying that the counter protesters would be scared of being there. Why would they be scared? Should they have a reason to be?

Counter protesters would think twice about confronting 25,000 armed men. That's why it didn't look like Portland.

[tdawg87]

1 minute ago, Lhalo said:

Counter protesters would think twice about confronting 25,000 armed men. That's why it didn't look like Portland.

So they should be afraid of getting shot because they were counter protesting.

Is that what gun owners want? Stay out of my way or get shot? Don't tread on me?

[Lhalo]

Just now, tdawg87 said:

So they should be afraid of getting shot because they were counter protesting.

Is that what gun owners want? Stay out of my way or get shot? Don't tread on me?

Gun owners want to be able to protect themselves. It's pretty simple. You suck at fishing.

[tdawg87]

3 minutes ago, Lhalo said:

Gun owners want to be able to protect themselves. It's pretty simple. You suck at fishing.

Protect themselves from people who disagree with them? K

[tdawg87]

I caught a fish once. I was 5. It was super neat. But then I broke the rod.

[Lhalo]

18 minutes ago, tdawg87 said:

Protect themselves from people who disagree with them? K

Protect themselves from people who wish to harm them. There were 25,000 people at that protest and it was as peaceful as any protest possibly could be. 90% of the people there were armed and yet there was no violence. Maybe legal gun owners aren't the problem?

[tdawg87]

6 minutes ago, Lhalo said:

Protect themselves from people who wish to harm them. There were 25,000 people at that protest and it was as peaceful as any protest possibly could be. 90% of the people there were armed and yet there was no violence. Maybe legal gun owners aren't the problem?

I agree with everything you just said. I'm very happy nothing happened.

Obviously protecting themselves from people who wish to do them harm is fine. But our argument was about counter protesters and "being afraid" to be there. The point is they shouldn't be. 

I'm not talking about Antifa or anything like that (they would have no reason to be there whatsoever). 

[Lhalo]

1 minute ago, tdawg87 said:

I agree with everything you just said. I'm very happy nothing happened.

Obviously protecting themselves from people who wish to do them harm is fine. But our argument was about counter protesters and "being afraid" to be there. The point is they shouldn't be. 

I'm not talking about Antifa or anything like that (they would have no reason to be there whatsoever). 

Why would the counter protesters be afraid though? Nobody was threatening counter protesters. There were a few there btw.

[tdawg87]

1 minute ago, Lhalo said:

Why would the counter protesters be afraid though? Nobody was threatening counter protesters. There were a few there btw.

Then I suppose we agree and have nothing left to argue. I took your comments about them not being there as an implication that they were afraid.

[Lhalo]

Just now, tdawg87 said:

Then I suppose we agree and have nothing left to argue. I took your comments about them not being there as an implication that they were afraid.

But I still want to argue!

[tdawg87]

2 minutes ago, Lhalo said:

But I still want to argue!

[Lhalo]

2 minutes ago, calscuf said:

I love the “everyone was armed and nobody got shot!” argument.  

It's not an argument.

[Jason]

Maybe I’m remembering it wrong but didn’t the Dems say no to that stuff during the inquiry? So does that mean the house is guilty of obstruction? This seems like a big waste of time 

[tdawg87]

2 minutes ago, Jason said:

Maybe I’m remembering it wrong but didn’t the Dems say no to that stuff during the inquiry? So does that mean the house is guilty of obstruction? This seems like a big waste of time 

No to what stuff? They were trying to get Bolton and Mulvaney and pretty much everyone to testify but the President blocked that from happening, because he's innocent.

[Adam]

We need the New Chinaman Virus to hit Washington

[Jason]

11 minutes ago, tdawg87 said:

No to what stuff? They were trying to get Bolton and Mulvaney and pretty much everyone to testify but the President blocked that from happening, because he's innocent.

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/11/21/us/politics/impeachment-witnesses.html

This whole thing is a joke and it's all just political posturing 

Edited January 21, 2020 by Jason

[Adam]

Derek Jeter has 5 Gold Gloves. hahahahahaha

[Jason]

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/policy/energy/trump-pledges-to-help-plant-1-trillion-trees

How long before the Dems become anti-tree now?

[the dude abides]

MAGAs gonna MAGA:

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/former-endeavor-air-pilot-charged-after-allegedly-writing-racist-graffiti-on-bathroom-wall/ar-BBZ9uIN?ocid=spartanntp

 

[Adam]

Just now, the dude abides said:

MAGAs gonna MAGA:

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/former-endeavor-air-pilot-charged-after-allegedly-writing-racist-graffiti-on-bathroom-wall/ar-BBZ9uIN?ocid=spartanntp

 

I'm at a convention in Miami in a month and just booked a round at Doral. Hoping for some sweet, sweet MAGA action

[tdawg87]

1 hour ago, Jason said:

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/policy/energy/trump-pledges-to-help-plant-1-trillion-trees

How long before the Dems become anti-tree now?

No. This is good. There's no way he's going to plant anywhere close to even a billion trees (a trillion is a third of the entire tree population on the planet). But despite his normal stupidity this is good.

How much will it cost? Does this mean Cons can start caring about the environment now?

[St1ck]

2 minutes ago, tdawg87 said:

No. This is good. There's no way he's going to plant anywhere close to even a billion trees (a trillion is a third of the entire tree population on the planet). But despite his normal stupidity this is good.

How much will it cost? Does this mean Cons can start caring about the environment now?

That should give you plenty enough trees for you to lift your leg on. 

[tdawg87]

Just now, st1ckboy said:

That should give you plenty enough trees for you to lift your leg on.