Can this trend be reversed? SJWs

[mtangelsfan 9,255]

"Huffington Post"

 

LOL

[Angelsjunky 8,277]

Yeah, what a meanie.

 

LOL at mtangelsfan LOLing at anything that doesn't fit his worldview

[mtangelsfan 9,255]

Lots of things don't fit my worldview.  Again, for a guy who is complaining that people make assumptions, you make a lot of them.  I'm fine with folks, entities, that don't fit my worldview.

 

What is funny is the use of a clearly biased resource to try to make some kind of factual argument.  You don't see me posting Fox News op eds, and if I did I would expect blow back from it.

[calscuf 9,956]

Wait. Which one is Jon?

[AngelsLongBall 2,148]

Wait. Which one is Jon?

Freda's boss.

And who's Freda?

She's my secretary

[Angelsjunky 8,277]

What assumption did I make? You LOLed the Huffington Post, as if everything printed by them is a joke, which furthers my assumption that you have a relatively narrow filter of what views you will entertain, what you deem worthy of consideration.

 

As for "biased resources," can you please point me to one that isn't biased? And regardless of whether HP is biased, are you questioning whether or not white supremacists are rallying for Trump? Do you think the HP is lying about it or that they aren't actually white supremacists?

 

You continually look for something wrong in everything I say on this forum.

[mtangelsfan 9,255]

Bias is relative.

[Angelsjunky 8,277]

I agree. But you didn't really respond to what I said - you just looked for whatever you could find to disagree with, and went with that. Nothing new.

[mtangelsfan 9,255]

No I don't.

 

 

[Glen 8,916]

Goddamned stupid kids. That's all I have to say.

[Angelsjunky 8,277]

No I don't.

 

 

 

LOL. Well done.

[NrM 1,032]

Huffington post is one of the biggest sjw clickbait sites around. They're probably worse than sites like buzzfeed, gawker, jezebel because people actually think they're a legit go to website for political news.

AJ posting hufftington is like MT using briebart as a source, which is probably more biased than foxnews.

I did post an article to briebart in this thread, but that's because it is extremely relevant to the topic.

Edited February 26, 2016 by Mr. Meeseeks

[Blarg 25,799]

Wait. Which one is Jon?

The guy being a bit of a jackass.

[Angelsjunky 8,277]

I'm clearly the only jackass on this forum. In fact, I'm sort of a second-rate jackass compared to some here.

[Angelsjunky 8,277]

Mr. Meeseeks, you can attack the link source all you want, it doesn't change the fact that white supremacists love Donald Trump.

[NrM 1,032]

I'm clearly the only jackass on this forum. In fact, I'm sort of a second-rate jackass compared to some here.

nah you okay in my book. I like seeing different opinions and views on angelswin (unlike the sjws you seem to align with Edited February 26, 2016 by Mr. Meeseeks

[calscuf 9,956]

The guy being a bit of a jackass.

 

I thought your name is Eric?

[Angelsjunky 8,277]

nah you okay in my book. I like seeing different opinions and views on angelswin (unlike the sjws you seem to align with

 

Nice edit there, Mr. Meeseeks.

[Glen 8,916]

Huffington post is one of the biggest sjw clickbait sites around. They're probably worse than sites like buzzfeed, gawker, jezebel because people actually think they're a legit go to website for political news.

AJ posting hufftington is like MT using briebart as a source, which is probably more biased than foxnews.

I did post an article to briebart in this thread, but that's because it is extremely relevant to the topic.

Lol. It's okay when you did it because it was extremely relevant.

"Your honor, I strenuously object! "

[NrM 1,032]

Lol. It's okay when you did it because it was extremely relevant.

"Your honor, I strenuously object! "

at least i can admit briebart is a far right biased website.

[red321 5,581]

Here, is this a better link than Huffington Post?

 

http://www.politico.com/story/2016/02/david-duke-trump-219777

 

David Duke: Voting against Trump is 'treason to your heritage'

 

http://talkingpointsmemo.com/muckraker/trump-robocall-super-tuesday-william-daniel-johnson

 

A white supremacist super PAC is rolling out a fresh robocall campaign this week in Vermont and Minnesota telling voters, “Don’t vote for a Cuban. Vote for Donald Trump.”

[NrM 1,032]

I'd rather be labeled a white sepremacist than a feminist or progressive

Edited February 26, 2016 by Mr. Meeseeks

[mtangelsfan 9,255]

Here, is this a better link than Huffington Post?

 

http://www.politico.com/story/2016/02/david-duke-trump-219777

 

David Duke: Voting against Trump is 'treason to your heritage'

 

http://talkingpointsmemo.com/muckraker/trump-robocall-super-tuesday-william-daniel-johnson

 

A white supremacist super PAC is rolling out a fresh robocall campaign this week in Vermont and Minnesota telling voters, “Don’t vote for a Cuban. Vote for Donald Trump.”[/size]

Who is PETA supporting? Seriously unless the candidate embraces the support who even cares?

Of all the things to dislike about Trump......................

[Spirit 9,244]

Here, is this a better link than Huffington Post?

 

http://www.politico.com/story/2016/02/david-duke-trump-219777

 

David Duke: Voting against Trump is 'treason to your heritage'

 

http://talkingpointsmemo.com/muckraker/trump-robocall-super-tuesday-william-daniel-johnson

 

A white supremacist super PAC is rolling out a fresh robocall campaign this week in Vermont and Minnesota telling voters, “Don’t vote for a Cuban. Vote for Donald Trump.”

 

 

And there's the "special place in hell" quote Dems have been waiting for the GOP to give them.

[red321 5,581]

I'd rather be labeled a white sepremacist than a feminist or progressive

 

Probably tells us all we need to know