Jump to content
  • Welcome to AngelsWin.com

    AngelsWin.com - THE Internet Home for Angels fans! Unraveling Angels Baseball ... One Thread at a Time.

    Register today to comment and join the most interactive online Angels community on the net!

    Once you're a member you'll see less advertisements. If you become a Premium member and you won't see any ads! 

     

IGNORED

Charleston church shooting: Multiple fatalities in South Carolina, source says


Recommended Posts

I was using a phone and wrote something twice.

I'm saying that it's not good to say that we should go back or forward in time. They should just say what they want.

When people say they like the fifties, they mean the more stable families and not the Jim Crow South.

 

Edit: I guess you can use it as an example of something, "in this time, the this rate was this much," but sometimes things occurred simultaneosly but weren't related. For example, some parts of the US was more racist, but that has nothing to do with respect for family.
 

juan, i have no idea what your response has to do with my statement. can you explain a bit better?

Edited by Juan Savage
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was using a phone and wrote something twice.

I'm saying that it's not good to say that we should go back or forward in time. They should just say what they want.

When people say they like the fifties, they mean the more stable families and not the Jim Crow South.

 

Edit: I guess you can use it as an example of something, "in this time, the this rate was this much," but sometimes things occurred simultaneosly but weren't related. For example, some parts of the US was more racist, but that has nothing to do with respect for family.

 

 

i agree with you in principal. the idea of returning to the values of another decade is fraught with inaccurate memory.

 

btw, it would be easier to read your posts if you wrote your thoughts below the quote. it's rather annoying for you to write above what you're quoting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i agree with you in principal. the idea of returning to the values of another decade is fraught with inaccurate memory.

btw, it would be easier to read your posts if you wrote your thoughts below the quote. it's rather annoying for you to write above what you're quoting.

OK. it just pops up on my phone that way. My idea is basically that it's too easy to associate exclusive things.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...