Jump to content
  • Welcome to AngelsWin.com

    AngelsWin.com - THE Internet Home for Angels fans! Unraveling Angels Baseball ... One Thread at a Time.

    Register today to comment and join the most interactive online Angels community on the net!

    Once you're a member you'll see less advertisements. If you become a Premium member and you won't see any ads! 

     

IGNORED

Bad Metrolink Accident in Oxnard


Lhalo

Recommended Posts

There was another train/truck collision last night, a block or two away from last week's incident, on the same tracks.

http://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/la-me-ln-amtrak-collision-camarillo-20150301-story.html

 

10 miles away, not a block or 2.

 

On the bright side.  Just wait till high speed rail comes along.  Against the recommendations of the Japanese and French high speed rail bids, that lost bids to go to the lowest inexperienced bidder.  The cheap version will probably be using the same tracks.  So imagine those tracks with trains going 100+.  

 

There is a reason why the Japanese Shinkansen has never had an accident or fatality.  They have zero rail crossings, and their tracks are solely dedicated and wider than standard rail.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6.2 miles away. I helped clean up the first one, so its pretty crazy to have a second incident right down the road.

Pray to god they don't implement high speed along existing 'neighborhood tracks' like this. CA legislature can't be that dumb, right?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6.2 miles away. I helped clean up the first one, so its pretty crazy to have a second incident right down the road.

Pray to god they don't implement high speed along existing 'neighborhood tracks' like this. CA legislature can't be that dumb, right?

 

Oh, you helped move the wrecked equipment down to Moorpark?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am shocked that a pick up truck derailed an entire train. It isn't unheard of for trains to plow into much bigger vehicles and nothing ever happens to the train, while the semi truck or whatever gets obliterated.

 

It's likely because the train was operating in "push mode" with the locomotive at the rear.  The last car of the train, called a cabcar, has controls like the locomotive does so the train can run the opposite direction without turning around.  This is the view from a Metrolink cabcar.  Passenger seating begins just behind this.

 

TD2011D2.jpg

 

These cabcars are much lighter and have less crash protection than a locomotive does, which is why they are universally hated by all locomotive engineers.  I suspect debris from the trailer got underneath the cabcar and lifted the front wheelset off the tracks.  All it takes is a few inches of vertical movement for the wheel flange to lift over the rail and derail. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 miles away, not a block or 2.

 

On the bright side.  Just wait till high speed rail comes along.  Against the recommendations of the Japanese and French high speed rail bids, that lost bids to go to the lowest inexperienced bidder.  The cheap version will probably be using the same tracks.  So imagine those tracks with trains going 100+.  

 

There is a reason why the Japanese Shinkansen has never had an accident or fatality.  They have zero rail crossings, and their tracks are solely dedicated and wider than standard rail.  

 

Don't worry, our state government knows what it's doing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am shocked that a pick up truck derailed an entire train. It isn't unheard of for trains to plow into much bigger vehicles and nothing ever happens to the train, while the semi truck or whatever gets obliterated.

 

It could also be the rail itself.  If the impact dislodges the rail even an inch, it could be enough for a derailment.  That's one thing I noticed about the rail accident last week.  That track was all f'd up.  I'm surprised they got it back up and running so quick.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It could also be the rail itself.  If the impact dislodges the rail even an inch, it could be enough for a derailment.  That's one thing I noticed about the rail accident last week.  That track was all f'd up.  I'm surprised they got it back up and running so quick.

 

they brought in some chinese immigrants to fix it real quick, just like the good ol' days.

 

 

 

 

too soon?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not sure if you can or want to answer this but do you feel the investigation is going well? Do you think the truck was stuck on the tracks and this was all one big accident?

 

I'm not sure how to answer that.  Unlike aviation, railroad accidents are fairly straightforward.  You don't necessarily need video or the event recorder (railroad equivalent of black box) to determine what happened here.  It is good the NTSB decided to investigate.  They don't respond to every derailment or collision.  More on that in a second. 

 

There is a precedent for drivers making errant right turns onto live railroad tracks that run parallel to a road.  I think it's a combination of drivers not paying attention, not familiar with the area, fatigued, or else too reliant on GPS navigation.  As you know, older GPS devices are not as precise and the verbal commands not as well timed.  The driver might have turned onto the railroad tracks because his GPS device (if he had one) said to turn right on the parallel road. 

 

Part of the reason the NTSB showed up is because three of the four Metrolink cars have the Crash Energy Management (CEM) technology that the NTSB recommended after the 2005 Metrolink crash in Glendale.  This is what CEM is supposed to accomplish WITHOUT causing a derailment.

 

 

My personal feeling is that CEM is of minimal value when hitting cars or trucks at grade crossings.  It's most useful in train vs train collisions.  The redesign of the new cabcars to incorporate CEM may have contributed to this derailment, however. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One thing that's bothersome about cabcars, and ESPECIALLY the new ones bought by Metrolink, is the lack of a large "snowplow" on the front to push debris out of the way.  Click on the photos for a closer look.  The first photo shows a cabcar identical to the one in last week's crash.  Look at the leading set of wheels and how accessible (and visible) they are to debris getting behind the plow and underneath the wheels.  All it takes is hitting something off-center for this to happen. 

 

8553442460_70ca7c075a_h.jpg

 

 

Now examine what the front of a Metrolink locomotive looks like.  The plow on locomotives is substantially larger.  See the difference?  It's not only taller but wider too. 

 

15884684896_3ccc949f23_b.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why would they choose the former over the latter? Cost?

Thanks for your insight btw.

 

Do you mean why use cabcars instead of locomotives on each end?  Commuter trains don't need two locomotives.  Acceleration would be faster but you'd waste a lot of money on fuel and maintenance and equipment costs doing it that way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...