Jump to content
  • Welcome to AngelsWin.com

    AngelsWin.com - THE Internet Home for Angels fans! Unraveling Angels Baseball ... One Thread at a Time.

    Register today to join the most interactive online Angels community on the net!

    Once you're a member you'll see less advertisements. Become a Premium member and you won't see any ads! 

     

IGNORED

Keith Law ranks Angels' minor league system 27th


Recommended Posts

http://insider.espn.go.com/mlb/story/_/id/12211903/chicago-cubs-no-1-farm-system-rankings-2015-mlb?ex_cid=InsiderTwitter_law_2015rankingall30farmsystems

 

 

"27. Los Angeles Angels

They were a lock to be 30th before they acquired Andrew Heaney in the Howie Kendrick trade and signed Cuban amateur Roberto Baldoquin, but after those two and first-rounder Sean Newcomb, the system drops off very quickly."

 

Top 5:

 

Cubs

Twins

Astros

Mets

Red Sox

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

LOL at Law

You have your measuring stick, and we have ours (Shoe, Calhoun, Morin, Cron all contributing as first year MLB players this past season).

He is ranking the farm for this season and none of those guys spent significant time in the minors last season.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just remember how many Angels prospects panned out when their farm system was ranked in the top 10.

 

Kendrick, Aybar, weaver, Santana, Napoli, Saunders, Callaspo and more. It was pretty solid. Did it produce a ton of great players? No. But it produced a lot of guys who are solid and made the occasional all star team. 

 

Many here consider that production a sign of the failure of our farm system but are now holding up guys like Calhoun and Shoemaker as signs if success. Those guys are no better than Kendrick, Aybar or most of the guys I mentioned.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Callaspo was traded for Bulger, who didn't work out. Then the Angels traded O'Sullivan and Smith get him back. Then dumped him again for Green who has yet to produce. In effect he was a four player deal none of which has really helped the Angels so far.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Callaspo was traded for Bulger, who didn't work out. Then the Angels traded O'Sullivan and Smith get him back. Then dumped him again for Green who has yet to produce. In effect he was a four player deal none of which has really helped the Angels so far.

 

 

Callaspo has been in the majors for what, 8 years now. he was a starter for much of that. That's a solid major leaguer. Once again, not great but solid. So far, other than Trout or Richards that's pretty much the best our system has produced in the last 5 years. 

 

Alberto was traded but he was largely a product of our system and part of why the system was ranked so highly (a very tiny part).

 

I'm just saying those highly ranked systems produced some good players. In fact more than our current lower ranked system.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Kendrick, Aybar, weaver, Santana, Napoli, Saunders, Callaspo and more. It was pretty solid. Did it produce a ton of great players? No. But it produced a lot of guys who are solid and made the occasional all star team. 

 

Many here consider that production a sign of the failure of our farm system but are now holding up guys like Calhoun and Shoemaker as signs if success. Those guys are no better than Kendrick, Aybar or most of the guys I mentioned.

 

I'd rather have 28-year-old Shoemaker than 28-year-old Santana or Saunders.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Man, the butthurt around here whenever someone "criticizes" the Angels is just too much. Anyhow, he's not really criticizing them. If anything, we should be happy that #27 isn't #30 like it was last year. Also, why do people assume that anyone who says anything non-glowing about the Angels is biased or uninformed? Aren't we biased?

 

As for the Red Sox, they've produced quite a few good players over the last decade. How about Lester, Pedroia, Ellsbury, Buchholz, Bard, Lowrie, Bogaerts, Doubront, Reddick, not to mention Hanley Ramirez, Papelbon, Moss, Anibal Sanchez, etc. All of these players have appeared on Red Sox prospects lists over the last decade - and probably more that I'm not remembering or finding (I searched a few of Sickels' top 20 lists going back to 2005).

 

That said, the Red Sox and Yankees do seem to get a tad overrated, but not by as much as some here say. Keith Law is a pretty good analyst.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...