Jump to content
  • Welcome to AngelsWin.com

    AngelsWin.com - THE Internet Home for Angels fans! Unraveling Angels Baseball ... One Thread at a Time.

    Register today to comment and join the most interactive online Angels community on the net!

    Once you're a member you'll see less advertisements. If you become a Premium member and you won't see any ads! 

     

IGNORED

Colon actually marks for an exclamation point.


Recommended Posts

The Angels are 4th in the AL for team ERA

 

The bullpen has a 64% save rate which ranks them 10th, well below league average.

They are 11th in holds

Again 10th in high leverage situations (should be referred to as choking)

They have the 3rd most blown saves.

They lead the entire American League in allowing inherited runners to score - 42%

 

I just don't see how we are needing to focus on picking up another starter. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Angels are 4th in the AL for team ERA

 

The bullpen has a 64% save rate which ranks them 10th, well below league average.

They are 11th in holds

Again 10th in high leverage situations (should be referred to as choking)

They have the 3rd most blown saves.

They lead the entire American League in allowing inherited runners to score - 42%

 

I just don't see how we are needing to focus on picking up another starter.

That's easy.

We're not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Protect the rotation with 2 rookies out there now. 

 

SP may not be bigger then RP now, I'll give anyone that, but it is down the line over Skaggs and Shoemaker. Skaggs is on a season IP pitch limit, and if Shoemake endures, he's on that watch as well.  Are they not rookies?  So, if the Halos don't protect the rotation but the bullpen about their moves, then how uneasy will it feel later and into the post season without Skaggs and possibly Shoemaker.     

Edited by HaloRed16
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Protect the rotation with 2 rookies out there now. 

 

SP may not be bigger then RP now, I'll give anyone that, but it is down the line over Skaggs and Shoemaker. Skaggs is on a season IP pitch limit, and if Shoemake endures, he's on that watch as well.  Are they not rookies?  So, if the Halos don't protect the rotation but the bullpen about their moves, then how uneasy will it feel later and into the post season without Skaggs and possibly Shoemaker.     

 

what are their season IP pitch limits?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Meanwhile, Oakland is 1-up on us now.  Beane's moved to significantly protect that A's rotation by getting Samardjia and Hammel because what has been their strong area was starting to look shaky: Chavez (that he's pitched bullpen before only) and Kazmir (over a possible recurring injury that could bench him for awhile).

 

If Di Poto answers back with reinforcing the bullpen without the starting pitching, is that the answer? 

 

I don't think so. 

Edited by HaloRed16
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lou: The Brewers and Nats set Gallardo's (2009) and Strausberg's (2011) at 180 IP, allowing them to go over it upon the final start.  Skaggs will probably be there, too, if he continues to pitch fairly deep into the games with each outing.  Shoemaker came on later but if he performs the same way, there's that watch for him, too.

 

Di Poto's moved on Thacker to replace Burnett.  It looks like their stashing Santiago away as starting rotation backup reinforcement now, but that's a risk with passing up for the better reinforcement on the market now. 

 

Thus, for Colon or someone else, Santiago might actually chip as part of a trade.      

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Shoemaker topped out at 184 IP last season. He should be fine to handle a regular workload down the stretch.

 

And while Skaggs's workloads have been lighter between the DL stint where he missed 3 turns in the rotation and the fact that the team is going with a 6 man rotation for the next turn or two through likely even reduces that concern.

 

At this point I'm not seeing the dire need to start trading prospects for Colon.

Edited by jshep
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lou: The Brewers and Nats set Gallardo's (2009) and Strausberg's (2011) at 180 IP, allowing them to go over it upon the final start. 

 

Strasberg only pitched 15 innings in 2011, he went down for the rest of the season with Tommy John surgery. He only pitched 159 innings in 2012, they shut him down the first week into September to protect his surgically repaired arm.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Strasberg only pitched 15 innings in 2011, he went down for the rest of the season with Tommy John surgery. He only pitched 159 innings in 2012, they shut him down the first week into September to protect his surgically repaired arm.

Strasburg got hurt in 2010. The (24 not 15) 2011 innings came at the end of the year Edited by m0nkey
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Eric:

How do transcend 170 IP from the minors to the majors?  Maybe that's where his limit will be then, if he keeps it up!

 

The bottom line is they're rookies and likely on limits.   

 

Shoemaker pitched over 180 innings last season and is 27 years old. There will be no pitch limits put on him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...