Taking Angels record with a grain of salt?

[Stradling]

Do you even have a point? Or are you just trolling?

I made my point in my first post. My point being it is too early to panic about divisional records. I struggle with looking at three series this year and assuming the rest of the season will be a failure. We are 1-2 against the Rangers and the A's and we got blown the **** out in the first series against Seattle. We have won both series against the Astros, we split the second series against the Mariners. We are currently down 0--1 in this series against them with three to go, so more than likely we will have to play well to split. Just because we disagree doesn't mean I'm trolling this thread.

[ScottT]

The Angels' record against Texas, Seattle, and Oakland so far is as meaningful and important as their record against Tampa, Toronto, and Cleveland.  Like their record in one run games a few weeks ago, it is a fluke.  They likely won't continue to win only 25% of their games against those AL West teams... or win 82% of their games against the other three teams.  

[OregonLAA]

Ok, so if the Angels finish with 90+ wins and a losing record in division and the A's finish with 89 wins and a winning record in division does it really matter?

No, I just think the likelihood of coming out ahead in the division with a losing record against the AL West is highly unlikely. I'll take the division either way, but I wish we could beat the mother effing teams we play 60 times a year

[KevinJ14]

So what do you guys think now after that 3-7 road trip. Or could you say that it's too early?

Edited June 6, 2014 by KevinJ14

[Lou]

So what do you guys think now after that 3-7 road trip. Or could you say that it's too early?

 

Yes. We're barely 1/3 of the way through the season